" /> Kowabunga: February 2007 Archives

ConservaGear

Anti-Terrorist, Liberal Bashing t-shirts, bumper stickers and more.

ConservaGear

Get the Right Stuff at ConservaGear

Sqotty's Blogroll

Minnesota Organization
of Bloggers

Blogs For Bush

GOP Bloggers

Newsfeeds

Reciprocal Links

Acknowledgments

All trademarks and related service marks are the sole property of their respective owners.

« January 2007 | Main | March 2007 »

February 28, 2007

U.N. WantsTo Tax America

Some scientific Dunsels on the U.N. payroll are at it again, calling for a global temperature ceiling. From Voice of America:

A group of 18 scientists from 11 countries is calling on the international community to act quickly to prevent catastrophic climate change.

In a report requested by the United Nations and partially paid for by the privately funded U.N. Foundation, the panel warns that any delay could lead to a dangerous rise in sea levels, increasingly turbulent weather, droughts and disease.

Question to these "scientists:" How do you stop the unstoppable?

The modern warming trend, which has been going on since 1850, is a natural phenomenon, not something mankind has triggered. All one has to do is look at the geological evidence to understand that there isn't anything, short of extinguishing the sun, that can be done about it.

Still, they clamor about carbon dioxide emissions (with CO2 accounting for about 350 parts per million, a little less than 0.04%, in the atmosphere), and that something has to be done about those nasty fossil fuels.

Some of their concerns, such as rise in sea levels, regardless of the fact that sea levels change as the Earth's climate warms and cools, rising and falling with each cycle; droughts can be countered with the construction of desalination plants in the coastal region; the spread of virulent diseases, such as the bubonic plague, were spread by rodents during times of global cooling.

Now we get to the main focus of their agenda:

Holdren, however, says even these measure will achieve very little unless they are accompanied by a global tax on greenhouse gas emissions. "We don't think ultimately society will get it right in terms of the full range and scope of activities needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, until there is an additional incentive in the form of a price on greenhouse gas emissions, either through a carbon tax or a cap and trade approach," he said.

As the United States is considered the "worst offender" when it comes to CO2 emissions, it is clear that their agenda is to tax America into oblivion. Such a tax goes against the very foundation of our society: no taxation without representation. The cornerstone is that there shall be no taxation except through by the consent of the people to be taxed, via there ELECTED representatives. This is why all tax bills begin in the House of Representatives. We "the people" do not have elected representation in the United Nations. The U.N. is made up of a bunch of appointed bureaucrats, mainly from socialist countries and totalitarian regimes. Any such global tax, which is clearly designed to break America economically, is a clear violation of sovereignty (as are all international laws) and adoption of which would be a direct violation of our Constitution.

Quite frankly, I've pretty much had it with the U.N. and the puppet governments that make up a large part of that body politic. Their petty jealousy of America has further corrupted that already heavily corrupted organization. With incidents as the "food for oil" scandal in Iraq, and the "food for sex" scandal in the Congo, how can we accept anything the U.N. claims as being legitimate?

If any such treaty as Kyoto, or its planned successors, is signed by the United States, every politician involved with passing and signing such, should be immediately removed from office for violating the U.S. Constitution, which they have sworn to uphold.

Tags:

February 27, 2007

Iraq Weapons Caches and Cheney Attacked

Yesterday it was announced that a large weapons cache was discovered North of Baghdad in Iraq. From FoxNews:

U.S. and Iraqi forces have seized a large weapons cache that includes parts for sophisticated roadside bombs that are believed to originate in Iran, U.S. military investigators said.

...the arsenal is one of the biggest found north of the Iraqi capital and contains components for so-called EFPs - explosively formed projectiles that fire a slug of molten metal that can penetrate armored vehicles.

The U.S. military has said elite Iranian corps are funneling EFPs to Shiite militias in Iraq for use against American troops. The area where the cache was found is dominated by Sunni insurgents but also includes pockets of Shiites.

Also discovered were a two dozen mortars and 15 rockets, as well as parts for 150 of these EFPs. There was no mention of small arms being recovered in the cache. The origin of the weapons is under investigation, however, it is strongly believed that the EFPs originated in Iran. If true, that would still leave the question of where the other weapons are coming from, although Iran would head that list, followed by Syria.

There have been 63 such weapons caches found in the Baghdad region since security sweeps began on Feb. 14th. These caches also included a fake boulder that had been prepped for a roadside bombing.

Hopefully these security sweeps and the recovery of such a large amount of weapons will put a damper on the attacks while measures are taken to better secure the border to prevent such arms from being smuggled in country.

Meanwhile, a Taliban suicide bomber attacked a base in Afghanistan where V.P. Cheney was visiting. At least 14 people were reported killed as a result of the attack, and a dozen injured. Cheney was not injured.

A Taliban terrorist stated (from an undiclosed location) that the intent was for the bomber to reach Cheney's location.

Tags:

February 25, 2007

Bell UH-1 Huey

In honor of Bruce Crandall receiving the Medal of Honor for his service in Vietnam, flying the Bell UH-1 Huey, we have the military aircraft of the week (a bit late, sorry).

The Huey was introduced in 1959 as a small unit transport aircraft, used to deliver and retrieve troops in the field. It saw extensive use throughout the Vietnam War with the Army, Marines, Navy, and even the USAF.

Prior to escalation under Johnson in 1965, the Huey was used in a variety of support roles for Green Berets and other military advisors operating in Vietnam. In addition to delivering troops to combat zones, there were models that were armed with a variety of weaponry, including rockets for close support of ground forces.

The USAF used the Huey to support its Special Operations Forces, and then later to assist CIA and commando operations against the communist sanctuaries in Cambodia and Laos. The USAF Huey's were nicknamed "Green Hornets."

The Huey frequently made night operations during the Vietnam era without night vision and/or radar equipment, making these missions all the more dangerous.

Although the U.S. Army phased out the UH-1 with the introduction of the Blackhawk, the Huey continues to see service with the U.S. Marine Corps, as well as numerous other countries around the globe.

Huey1.jpg
Huey on the ground.
Ia_Drang_Infantry_disembarking_from_Helicopter.jpg
A Huey dropping off troops during the Ia Drang battle.
Uh-1_vietnam.jpg
Another Vietnam era picture of the Huey.
uh-1-dvic328.jpg
Navy Huey, with man hanging from aircraft.
Uh-1n_takeoff.JPG
Marine Huey taking off, Iraq, 2003.
UH-1Y_Huey.jpg
Firing 2.75 inch rockets during testing

Tags:

February 24, 2007

Vietnam Vet Crandall Receives Medal of Honor

Bruce Crandall is finally receiving a Medal of Honor for his actions in the Battle of Ia Drang during the Vietnam War. From FoxNews:

As a 32-year-old helicopter pilot, he flew through a gauntlet of enemy fire, taking ammunition in and wounded Americans out of one of the fiercest battles of the Vietnam War, Army records say.

Now, a week after his 74th birthday, Crandall will receive the nation's highest military honor Monday in a White House ceremony with President Bush.

The article goes into some detail behind the action and the reason for his receiving the Medal of Honor. Anyone who has read the book We Were Soldiers, Once…and Young know that this honor is highly deserved.

During the battle, Crandall and his wingman, Ed Freeman (received the Medal in 2001), volunteered to fly numerous missions into a very hot landing zone that was constantly under fire, to resupply the troops on the ground with water, ammunition and medical supplies. They also flew out of the combat zone the wounded, saving more than 70 lives, as the med-evac pilots refused to go into this hot zone.

It takes a lot of guts to fly into battle zones such as the Ia Drang, yet these men and their crews did so when others refused to do it. Their dedication and performance is without measure.

If you are interested in learning more about the battle, read the book We Were Soldiers, Once. It is a well written telling of the battle and its aftermath; the parts where the wives and children tell their side of the wait in the States brought tears to my eyes.

And yes, the movie is good, too, but the book is better.

I am very glad to see that Bruce Crandall is receiving our nations highest honor. I wish that it had not been so long delayed.

Tags:

February 23, 2007

Obama Ridicules Cheney

Obama is showing that he is way out of his league. From MyWayNews:

Obama, speaking at a massive outdoor rally in Austin, Texas, said British Prime Minister Tony Blair's decision this week to withdraw 1,600 troops is a recognition that Iraq's problems can't be solved militarily.

"Now if Tony Blair can understand that, then why can't George Bush and Dick Cheney understand that?" Obama asked thousands of supporters who gathered in the rain to hear him. "In fact, Dick Cheney said this is all part of the plan (and) it was a good thing that Tony Blair was withdrawing, even as the administration is preparing to put 20,000 more of our young men and women in.

"Now, keep in mind, this is the same guy that said we'd be greeted as liberators, the same guy that said that we're in the last throes. I'm sure he forecast sun today," Obama said to laughter from supporters holding campaign signs over their heads to keep dry. "When Dick Cheney says it's a good thing, you know that you've probably got some big problems."

Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't recall Blair stating anything along the line that the war in Iraq was a lost cause or cannot be solved militarily, as Obama implies.

Obama is rather funny, as he recently stated that he was sick of the tit-for-tat goings-on in politics, yet here he is, bloviating about the British pulling out a part of their force, even as they announce that they will be boosting their force in Afghanistan and how if Cheney says that is good, then there must be problems.

On the upside, if Obama keeps pushing rhetoric like this, he'll be giving Hillary a good run for her money.

Tags:

Iran Continues On March To Nukes

Iran is continuing its pursuit of nuclear technology, and rapidly heading towards weapons development. Meanwhile, the U.N. continues to do nothing. From FoxNews:

Iran is "thumbing its nose" at the international community by expanding its uranium program, a top U.S. official said, setting the stage for difficult negotiations on new U.N. sanctions, with the U.S. likely to push for tougher measures.

In the wake of the U.N. nuclear agency's confirmation that Iran expanded its uranium enrichment program, senior diplomats from the five permanent Security Council nations and Germany will meet on Monday in London to start work on a new resolution to try to pressure Iran to suspend that program, which can lead to the production of nuclear weapons.

Among the permanent council members, Britain and France are likely to join the U.S. in a call for harsher sanctions than Russia and China will accept.

In the long run, it doesn't matter what sanctions are laid against Iran, as there is little doubt that some countries, Russia included, will choose to ignore them. Also, both Russia and China have veto power over any resolution that may be put forth.

Russia's ambassador to the United Nations is calling for a political outcome, not resolutions or sanctions. Unfortunately, Ahmadinejad has made it clear that there is zero chance for a political outcome has he has refused to come to the "bargaining table" unless Western countries cease all nuclear activities first. How can you have a diplomatic/politcal outcome when the problem child refuses to come to the table?

Further, all resolutions and sanctions being put forth have no teeth to back them up. so, what's the point in putting them forth?

The United Nations is clearly an organization of Dunsels, inspired by their own self-righteous rhetoric, and Iran is clearly a threat to world peace and stability in the Middle East.

Tags:

February 22, 2007

Washington's Birthday

Today is Washington's Birthday. Sometimes Americans, especially younger ones who grew up in age where we celebrate President's Day as opposed to Washington's Birthday, lose sight of this event.

Washington was not a politician, but a statesman, as well as a great general. The difference between a statesman and a politician is huge.

Many politicians look to push through agendas that may not always be in the country's best interest, or, worse, violate the Constitution, such as McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform.

There are also politicians who make politics their career, and will do their utmost to stay in power.

Statesmen put country before self, and the people they serve before the power they are entrusted with. And when they have completed their calling, they go home to their loved ones and enjoy the private life they so richly deserve.

There are politicians are in it for money and power, and never miss a beat when it comes to knocking the other guy down.

Statesmen are there to serve the people, all of them, not just a select sub-set of the electorate.

Washington was a Statesman, and one of the best America has ever been blessed to have.

Happy Birthday, President Washington. America needs more statesmen like you.

Tags:


Pelosi Moonbats About Cheney Remarks

Nancy Pelosi, Moonbat of the House, is whining about a statement V.P. Cheney made recently. From FoxNews:

"You cannot say as the president of the United States, 'I welcome disagreement in a time of war,' and then have the vice president of the United States go out of the country and mischaracterize a position of the speaker of the House and in a manner that says that person in that position of authority is acting against the national security of our country," the speaker said.

The quarrel began in Tokyo, where Cheney used an interview to criticize Pelosi and Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., over their plan to place restrictions on Bush's request for an additional $93 billion for the Iraq war to make it difficult or impossible to send 21,500 extra troops to Iraq.

"I think if we were to do what Speaker Pelosi and Congressman Murtha are suggesting, all we will do is validate the Al Qaeda strategy," the vice president told ABC News. "The Al Qaeda strategy is to break the will of the American people ... try to persuade us to throw in the towel and come home, and then they win because we quit."

I don't see how a strategy based on retreat and surrender to the enemy is considered patriotic or victorious. The armchair quarterbacks in Congress who are pushing to prevent not only the "surge," but also continued operations in Iraq, seem to believe that letting al-Qaeda and Iran gain control of Iraq as being a good thing. If they don't believe that the "surge" will help secure Baghdad, and then Iraq as a whole, they should let it take place, then they could at least say "told you so," instead of putting everything that our troops have done, including their sacrifices, at risk.

Patton once said that America loves a winner, and will not tolerate a loser. That was during WW2. Today, the mantra from the liberal-left is "America loves a loser, and will not tolerate a winner, unless it is an enemy of America."

Pelosi and the assorted Moonbats and Chicken Doves in Congress should not work to hamstring our Armed Forces in Iraq, and should do everything in its power to foster liberty and democracy in the Middle East, not abandon it because the job is tougher than they would like it to be.

Tags:


February 21, 2007

Obama On Campaign Trail

America’s favorite Chicken Dove, Barack Obama, is hot on the campaign trail, denouncing competitors for past support of the war to Liberate Iraq. From Examiner.com:

Obama spoke out sharply against the war as an Illinois state senator in October 2002, just as the U.S. Senate was voting to authorize the conflict. He later adopted a magnanimous attitude toward pro-war Democrats, only to curtail such forbearance upon entering the presidential race. ... "The decisions we make in Washington have consequences," the junior U.S. senator from Illinois told reporters in New Hampshire. "Obviously if the senators [had] voted down the authorization, we wouldn’t be in the situation we’re in now."

Burton went even further, telling the New Hampshire Union Leader newspaper: "Only Barack Obama opposed the war in Iraq from the start."

Actually, that last bit about only Obama being opposed to the war from the get go is not quite true. Saddam Hussein, his supporters, and many of the chicken doves in Hollywood were also against the war. This would explain why Obama is such a hit with Geffen and other Hollywood elites with immense wealth.

It is also wrong in regards to the Congressional votes in 2002, where 23 Senators voted against the authorization of military action against Saddam Hussein and Iraq. were Byrd, Boxer, Durbin, Feingold, and Kennedy, just to name a few.

It may be true that Obama is the only one running for President (at last of the front runners) that has been vocal against this war since the very beginning. That point I will concede. At least he is consistent.

However, in the past, he has also been vocal in his support of those who voted for war in Iraq, and has been non-critical of their vote. That has changed now that he has entered into the Presidential arena, all the while trying to link himself with Lincoln, as if he is capable of filling those shoes. One has to ask: does he know Lincoln was a Republican?

Tags:

February 20, 2007

Pakistani Leader Assassinated

Some religion of peace and tolerance. From FoxNews:

A Pakistani minister and woman's activist was shot dead Tuesday by an Islamic extremist for refusing to wear the veil.

Zilla Huma Usman, the minister for social welfare in Punjab province and an ally of President Pervez Musharraf, was killed as she was about to deliver a speech to dozens of party activists, by a "fanatic", who believed that she was dressed inappropriately and that women should not be involved in politics, officials said.

Usman was a true leader of women's rights in a region where women are considered to be little better than property. I have no doubt that we will hear some mention of this from the White House, and many other quarters denouncing her assassination by this Muslim fanatic. What I don't know is if we will hear any denouncement from organizations such as CAIR or NOW. I'll be surprised if either one comes forth with such. We'll see, as I would like to be proved wrong.

What is disturbing is that it should happen in the 21st Century, not in the 6th Century. Regardless, the murder of a woman for such a stupid "offense" as not wearing a veil should be decried far and wide.

Tags:

John Edwards: Israel Greatest Threat

It looks like John Edwards may well have stepped in it big time. From Variety:

There are other emerging fissures, as well. The aggressively photogenic John Edwards was cruising along, detailing his litany of liberal causes last week until, during question time, he invoked the "I" word -- Israel. Perhaps the greatest short-term threat to world peace, Edwards remarked, was the possibility that Israel would bomb Iran's nuclear facilities. As a chill descended on the gathering, the Edwards event was brought to a polite close.

Israel "the greatest short-term threat to world peace," has got to be the most ludicrous statement I have heard in a long time. Israel has been fighting for its existence since it was formed in 1948. From terrorist bombings (and other attacks) by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and other Palestinian terrorist groups, many that are backed by either Syria or Iran, sometimes both, as well as the pre-liberation Iraq when Hussein was still in power, to Hezbollah’s continued rocket attacks from Lebanon. Yet, despite the fact that the hostility towards Israel has been fueled by intolerant, totalitarian regimes, Edwards blames Israel.

I would think that Edwards had enough moxy to realize that the biggest threats to peace would be Iran’s nuclear ambitions, Syria, Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, destabilization and civil war in Iraq (which can draw in the neighboring countries, setting the Middle East in flames), to name a few hot spots.

Edwards is proving the John Kerry is not the only person to run for President who suffers "foot-in-mouth" disease.

Tags:

Ahmadinejad Implements "You First" Policy

Ahmadinejad is sounding like the Soviet Union under Krushchev. From FoxNews:

"That ... we shut down our nuclear fuel cycle program to let talks begin. It's no problem. But justice demands that those who want to hold talks with us shut down their nuclear fuel cycle program too. Then, we can hold dialogue under a fair atmosphere," Ahmadinejad said.

Back in the late '50s, towards the end of the Eisenhower administration, Eisenhower struck a bargain with Krushchev where both countries would cease developing and testing nuclear weapons. Only one side in that agreement held up their end. Can you guess which one?

It is clear that by demanding that the West cease uranium enrichment before it would do the same and resume talks, Ahmadinejad is hoping to buy sufficient time to continue its nuclear programs. Further, why should we trust the untrustworthy? Doing so would be folly of the worst sort. It will also never happen.

If Iran fails to comply with U.N. demands to cease and desist from developing nuclear technology, it may impose economic sanctions. Basically, a "threat" that has no teeth in it as there are countries (like Russia, Syria and China) that will continue to trade with Iran despite any sanctions. Without a military blockade of their ports of entry, any sanctions against Iran will be meaningless, and a military blockade will not be put into place.

The end result will be business as usual as Iran continues on the path to nuclear weapons, and the supplier of weapons grade materials to al-Qaeda.

Tags:

February 19, 2007

Estrich on Non-Binding Anti-War Resolutions

Susan Estrich is proving, once again, that she is a clueless Moonbat. From Blue Streak on FoxNews:

What's the point of a non-binding resolution that the president has already said would not affect his decisions?

How do you send a message to a person who isn't listening?

It is pretty presumptuous of her to assume that because the President, as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, as already stated that the troop escalation in Iraq will take place, does not mean that he is not listening. More likely than not, he is listening to representatives from all points of view. He is, however, in the position where he has to make the decisions in regards to ongoing military operations, not just in Iraq, which is the primary focus of the anti-war crowd's angst, but also in Afghanistan, Kosovo (we still have military operations there), and other hot spots around the globe.

He has listened to the leadership, and has chosen a course of action. It is the President who makes the decisions of where our armed forces are deployed. Not Congress. And not the anti-war crowd, who are attempting to turn Iraq into a 21st century Vietnam.

The resolution affirming support for the troops and opposition to the surge won't really do anything, notwithstanding the heated debate about whether to pass it. It won't stop the war, save a life, or slow the surge. Nancy Pelosi says the president can't completely ignore "the voice of the American people," but my bet is he'll try.

The reason the resolution matters is not because of its impact on the president, but on Congress; not because it will goad the president into action, but because it will force Congress to face its own fears.

The resolution matters, certainly, but not in the context that Estrich would have us believe. Such resolutions send a signal to the terrorists of al-Qaeda that America is losing its will to persevere in Iraq. The ayatollahs and mullahs of Iran are also listening, and see such resolutions as a green light to continue arming terrorists and sectarian death squads in Iraq. Syria and Hezbollah see it as an opportunity to exploit in the ongoing war against Israel, as they can expect that one day America will lose its will to support Israel as well.

Pelosi claims that the president cannot ignore "the voice of the American people," yet the only voice she hears is that of the anti-war zealots who want to see Iraq laid waste as was the country of Cambodia, in 1975, after the fall of Vietnam.

Estrich claims that such resolutions won't stop the war, nor save lives. However, they do cost lives, as violence escalates, as with the car bombing in Baghdad over the weekend in which some 60+ people were killed and attacks on bases, such as the one in which to American soldiers died, and 17 others were injured.

If Congress is to be goaded into action, let it be on to the path of winning the war and establishing free and democratic societies in Iraq and Afghanistan, and not abandon these fledgling allies to fall back into the hands of tyrants and murderers.

Many keep harping how this non-binding resolution in the House of Representatives will have no impact. They are wrong, and it is the people of Iraq, as well as our troops on the ground, who must pay the price of such folly.

Tags:

February 18, 2007

Hillary and Iraq War Votes

Hillary Clinton is appears to be working hard to appease the anti-war zealots that make up the hard-left core of the Democratic Party. In a piece on the New York Times online edition, it is pointed out that she is avoiding apologizing for her initial support in the 2002 vote for war in Iraq, or denouncing said vote as a mistake. To her credit, she refers to such tactics as being nothing more than a gimmick. Instead, she is favoring rhetoric used by John "Flipper" Kerry in 2004, the "If I knew then what I know now" tactic.

She is also attempting to appeal to the anti-war crowd by threatening to have the authorization for the war revoked if the troops are not redeployed beginning in the next 90 days.

Whether or not her rhetoric is sufficient to overcome her past votes on military operations in Iraq remains to be seen. It is obvious that it will not appeal to those who support establishing a free and democratic society in Iraq, but then she knows most people who support such will not vote for her any way. Thus her best option is that of appeasing the anti-war crowd, and allowing Iraq to become a 21st century Cambodia.

Tags:

February 17, 2007

A-10 Thunderbolt II, AKA Warthog

This week we're doing the A-10 Thunderbolt II. This heavily armed, but not very elegant, aircraft proved itself to be an excellent tactical ground support aircraft in the Gulf War in 1991, having destroyed over a thousand Iraqi tanks and over 2,000 other vehicles.

It was involved in Kosovo, the Afghanistan campaign as well as Gulf War II (the Liberation of Iraq).

Designed to fly with one engine, one tail, and half a wing, it can go into battle, take heavy damage, and still return home safely. It is one tough bird, and can sustain hits from armor-piercing and high explosive projectiles up to 23mm.

a10_fully_loaded.jpg a10s_ground.jpg
Thunderbolt_flight.jpg Thunderbolt_Formation.jpg
Thunderbolt_II_flight_above.jpg Kim_campbell_damage_a10.jpg

Photos courtesy of the USAF.

Tags:

Gadahn Reported On New Al-Qaeda Video

It has been reported that the traitor Adam Gadahn is the narrator of the latest video from al-Qaeda. From FoxNews:

The narrator on the English version of a video posted on the Web that Al Qaeda says shows an attack on U.S. and Afghan forces in Afghanistan is believed to be American Adam Gadahn, a member of Usama bin Laden's terror network who is on the FBI's most wanted list, experts said Friday.

Gadahn has appeared as a spokesperson under the name Azzam the American in previous Al Qaeda videos.

SITE Institute, which tracks terrorist groups, claimed the narration on the video - which is clearly an American accent - was done by Gadahn. U.S. intelligence officials said they believed it was Gadahn's voice, but were waiting for further analysis of the video.

Gadahn has been known to be involved in the production of previous videos for al-Qaeda, so his involvement in this new video is not surprising. I no longer think of this terrorist as an American. He gave up his right to U.S. citizenship when he joined al-Qaeda.

The video is an apparent attempt to disparage American claims of winning the war against terrorists in Afghanistan. Its release came as the United States and Britain plan to deploy more troops to the country after the worst year of insurgency-related violence since the Taliban regime was overthrown in 2001.

The video contains footage of an alleged attack on an outpost used by American and Afghani forces. According to the report, the outpost in question, Arghandab, may not have even been hosting Allied tropps at the time Taliban forces claimed to have attacked it.

What is interesting about the video, is that masked gunmen describe the outpost as having two compounds; one for the Americans and one for the "apostates." What they are saying is that the Afghani forces allied with the Americans, and working to establish a free and Democratic Afghanistan, are no longer considered to be Muslim, and therefor may be killed with impunity.

Enemy forces in the video are routinely referred to as apostates. It is possible that the "troops" that were filmed are not the real McCoy, but Taliban operatives. It is hard to tell. A few pickup trucks and a couple of people filmed from a long distance.

The outpost itself looks to be deserted in the video.

The video is available courtesy of the SITE Institute.

It is clear that the video is an attempt to undermine U.S. involvement in Afghanistan, just as similar videos have been successful in regards to U.S. involvement in Iraq.

Tags:

February 16, 2007

Two Dems Get Ant-War Resolution Right

The House of Representatives voted on a non-binding resolution of surrender to terrorist and death squad militias operating in Iraq. From FoxNews:

House Democrats on Friday sent President Bush the clearest message to date on his Iraq policy by passing a resolution that opposes a plan to send an additional 21,500 troops to the war-ravaged country.

"Today, in a loud voice, the Congress of the United States said to the president: 'We need a new direction in Iraq,'" said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., after the 246-182 vote.

There were 17 White Flag Republicans siding with the anti-free Iraq Dems, while two Democrats stood tall on the side of liberty. The two maverick Democrats were Jim Marshall of Georgia and Gene Taylor of Mississippi. Kudos to them for standing up for what is right.

It is sad to see that one of the White Flag Republicans is Jim Ramstad of Minnesota. There is some hope that his district will field a real Republican and not one who is pandering to the "let's surrender to the enemy" crowd.

Tags:

Ricky Marin and the Bird

Musical has been Ricky Martin uses his middle finger to express his view of president Bush. From MyWay news:

Ricky Martin, who was a headliner at the 2001 inauguration ball for President George W. Bush, has a message for the American commander in chief about war.

At a recent concert, the 35-year-old singer stuck up his middle finger when he sang the president's name in his song "Asignatura Pendiente," which includes the words, "a photo with Bush." The gesture last Friday prompted cheers from thousands of fans in the San Juan stadium.

One would think that someone who expresses themselves in music, whether through songwriting, or just delivering the lyrics, would be capable of expressing themselves in something other than obscenities.

Martin says he has a problem with anyone who pushes for war. I can accept that. I have a serious problem with people like Osama bin Laden, Kim Jong Il, Fidel Castro, Saddam Hussein (when he was still hanging around), Ahmadinejad, Mugtada al-Sadr, just to name a few. Yet I don’t see Martin using his outstretched middle finger to castigate these warmongering tyrants. He only uses obscene gestures when referring to the leader of the free world, or, more accurately, for George W. Bush.

When celebrities use the stage to denigrate America, I find it difficult to want to buy any of their products. I’d boycott his albums; the only problem is, I’ve never bought one, so what would be the point.

Tags:

Global Warming: Natural Causes #2

This is from Newswise.com:

A new report on climate over the world's southernmost continent shows that temperatures during the late 20th century did not climb as had been predicted by many global climate models.

This comes soon after the latest report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that strongly supports the conclusion that the Earth's climate as a whole is warming, largely due to human activity.

It also follows a similar finding from last summer by the same research group that showed no increase in precipitation over Antarctica in the last 50 years. Most models predict that both precipitation and temperature will increase over Antarctica with a warming of the planet.

David Bromwich, professor of geography and researcher with the Byrd Polar Research Center at Ohio State University, reported on this work at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science at San Francisco.

Thus proving the results from the climate models used by the U.N.'s IPCC are overblown.

Bromwich does make an attempt to defend the models, stating that they are global, and not region specific, however, that just proves, once again, that the accuracy of these computerized climate models. If they are being used to predict warming trends on a global basis, then they should have been designed to include data and variables on a global basis. In computer talk, "garbage in, garbage out."

This is not to say that there isn't a warming trend. As many scientists have pointed out, including Avery and Sanger in their book Unstoppable Global Warming, as well as the 1995 IPCC report, this warming trend has been going on since the Little Ice Age ended in 1850.

However, the politicization of Global Warming has resulted in known facts, such as the Medieval Warming Period (Viking Era) and the Little Ice Age to be ignored by groups pushing the "it's man's fault" agenda.

The factors impacting the Earth's climate appear to range in the millions, and some are only recently being understood, such the circumpolar westerlies, as pointed out in the article.

When one takes into account the science of the Earth's climate, it becomes obvious that it is, in fact, a natural phenomenon.

Tags:

February 15, 2007

Gore Concert To Heat Up Global Warming

Al Gore is pushing a series of "Save Our Planet" concerts in order to get out the message that Global Warming is all man’s fault; CO2 emissions are caused by our lust for technology. The concerts are being planned to take place in Europe, China, South Africa, Australia and the United States.

Here’s what’s wrong with this picture. They claim Global Warming is due to our CO2 emissions, so they plan on helping curb the amount of CO2 being dumped into the atmosphere by getting a number of rock and rollers (with their support entourage) to travel the world, on jets that emit large amounts of CO2; ground travel from the airports to various hotels and the concert venues for hundreds (thousands) of concert crew and performers, not to mention the hoped for hundreds of thousands (millions?) of concert attendees, all of which will be dumping CO2 into the atmosphere; put on these concerts that will use huge amounts of electricity, generated by power plants that emit CO2 (unless they specify that the electricity is coming from non-CO2 power plants, like nuclear reactors). And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. They also plan on broadcasting the concerts around the globe, all of which will be powered by electricity received from CO2 emitting power plants.

If they truly believed that CO2 emissions are causing global warming, then why are they putting on this series of concerts promoting their political agenda and dumping huge amounts of CO2 into our atmosphere? How hypocritical can you be?

Meanwhile, California crops are taking a beating due to freezing cold, no doubt brought on by greenhouse gases induced Global Warming.


ca_orange_crop_07.jpg

ca_orange_crop2_07.jpg

I guess this brings a whole meaning to the term "frozen orange juice."

Tags:

Comrade Chavez Threatens Confiscation Of Grocery Stores

This is what happens when you give complete power to a tyrant. From BreitBart News:

President Hugo Chavez threatened Wednesday to nationalize any privately owned supermarkets and food storage facilities caught hoarding inventories or violating price controls imposed on basic goods.

Accusing private companies of hoarding beef and other foods, Chavez warned supermarket owners and distributors that he would nationalize their facilities as soon as they gave him "an excuse."

"If they remain committed to violating the interests of the people, the constitution, the laws, I'm going to take the food storage units, corner stores, supermarkets and nationalize them," Chavez said during a televised broadcast. "So prepare yourselves!"


Chavez has been intent on nationalizing "strategic" sectors of the economy since winning re-election in December. He has moved quickly to buy out private interests in leading electricity and phone companies since the National Assembly gave him authority to enact sweeping measures by decree and accelerate the country's socialist transformation.

Comrade Chavez, having gained the power to execute is will by decree, bypassing the legislative process and all checks and balances, has already moved to nationalize energy and telecom sectors. As some of those sectors had foreign interests, he could not outright confiscate the businesses in total, but was forced to buy the foreign interests. There is no such roadblock when it comes to grocery stores.

No proof of violations is necessary, only accusations. If storeowners are violating price controls, it is most likely because they have a need to make a living. Price controls tend to make it very difficult for a business to make a profit, especially if they are set below the cost of production.

Should Comrade Chavez confiscate these businesses, it will be the people of Venezuela who will lose, not just the storeowners and their employees.

Hey, jazz and annarboriter, still think Venezuela is a model of Democracy?

Tags:

Hillary Like Muskie?

Over on the Washington Post, Harold Meyerson has come up with an interesting analogy on the Hillary’s bid for the Presidency in 2008.

As the ancient or merely studious among us will recall, the Democratic senator from Maine, who'd been Hubert Humphrey's running mate in 1968, entered his party's presidential contest in 1972 as the front-runner. His prospects were dashed in the New Hampshire snows, however. As popular memory has it, an indignant Muskie started crying while refuting a silly attack on him (though whether he was genuinely upset or merely sniffling during a frigid outdoor news conference was never authoritatively resolved). Muskie's more serious problem, however, was the Vietnam War, which he opposed.

His opposition, though, had none of the fervor or long-term consistency of another Democratic senator and presidential aspirant, George McGovern. By 1972, seven years had elapsed since the United States had sent ground forces to Vietnam, and Richard Nixon, through his invasion of Cambodia and stepped-up bombing campaigns, had made clear that the road to de-escalation would entail periodic escalations, at least as long as he was president. The Democratic base was in no mood for temporizing on Vietnam.

Party voters wanted out, and they wanted a nominee who'd been right on the war (almost) from the start: McGovern. Sic transit gloria Muskie.

Today, Hillary Clinton seems almost uncannily positioned to become the Ed Muskie of 2008. She opposes the U.S. military presence in Iraq but not with the specificity, fervor or bona fides of her leading Democratic rivals. As Muskie did with Vietnam, she supported the legislation enabling the U.S. invasion of Iraq, and she has been slower and more inconstant than her party rivals in coming around to opposing the continued U.S. occupation.

Meyerson continues the comparison between Hillary today and Muskie of 1972. It makes for good reading and poses some interesting possibilities. Will Hillary be able to galvanize the Far-Left that makes up the base of the modern Democratic party while continuing to support current operations in Iraq, or will she abandon Middle-America in the hopes of appeasing the party base, and throw Iraq to the wolves, siding with the Liberal-Left in pushing for an immediate withdrawal from Iraq? Will the fact that it was the Clinton Administration that set the U.S. policy on Iraq to one of deposing Hussein have a negative impact on Hillary?

We all know where she stands on many social issues, and there she has no problem with appealing to the Democratic Hard-Left core. However, it is the anti-war crowd (who are also Hard-Left) that dominates the core of the party, may well be looking for a hard-core anti-war candidate, just as Meyerson writes was done in 1972 when McGovern one the nomination. If so, that may well mean Barack Obama, will be at the top of the DNC ticket come November 2008.

Obama has all the charisma that Hillary lacks, and he has shown himself to be to the left of Ted Kennedy and John Kerry (and that is hard to do). Obama, unlike many of the Liberal-Left serving in the Senate, has always been against the war, and lacks the baggage Hillary is carrying for having voted in support of Liberating Iraq and continued military operations in that country.

It’s also interesting to note that in 1992, Bill Clinton was not even in the top three, let alone considered the front-runner when he was campaigning.

Ultimately, the question will come down to: does Hillary have the stamina to stay up front and overcome the baggage she is carrying in regards to Iraq; or will she succumb to one of the middle tier candidates who has been vocal against the war since before the invasion.

No matter how you slice and dice it, it’s going to be a very interesting and heated election cycle. Not to mention a long one.

Tags:

February 14, 2007

Ellison Makes Big Impression On Tancredo

Keith Ellison, Freshman Moonbat, er, Congressman, from Minnesota has a very weird way of reaching out and meeting his colleagues in Congress. From The Hill:

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) believes it is his right as a Muslim to be sworn into Congress with the Quran. But apparently, the freshman lawmaker doesn’t believe it’s Rep. Tom Tancredo’s (R-Colo.) right to smoke a cigar in his congressional office.

Ellison’s office called the Capitol Hill Police on Tancredo last Wednesday night as Tancredo was in his office smoking a cigar. The lawmakers have neighboring offices on the first floor of the Longworth House Office Building.

According to the piece, Ellison was informed that Tancredo is permitted to smoke in his office. The complaint stems from a claim that the smoke is passing through the walls (despite three air purifiers Tancredo has installed in his office). Sounds like the walls in the halls of Congress must be pretty thin. Or maybe Ellison and his staff simply don’t like being next door to a Republican.

Regardless of the reasons, Ellison would have done better to have gone next door and visited with Tancredo, expressing his concerns about the smoking rather than calling the cops. Sure, tobacco smoke stinks, but so does Ellison’s whining the cops.

Tags:


Where In The World Is Muqtada

It is now being reported that Muqtada al-Sadr, leader of the terrorist organization known as the Mahdi Army, has fled to Iran. From FoxNews:

The chief U.S. military spokesman in Iraq insisted Wednesday that Muqtada al-Sadr has left the country and is believed to be in Iran, despite denials from the radical Shiite cleric's supporters.

The statement by Maj. Gen. William Caldwell came after a U.S. official said al-Sadr left the country some weeks ago and is believed to be in Tehran, where he has family. The official, who also spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss U.S. monitoring activities, said fractures in al-Sadr's political and militia operations may be part of the reason for his departure. The move is not believed to be permanent, the official said.

Of course, there are those in Iraq, both in the government as well as among al-Sadr’s loyalists, that claim otherwise and that the U.S. assertion that al-Sadr is in Iran is politically motivated. They could be right, however, their claims can also be construed as politically motivated. Personally, I suspect that Caldwell’s statement, that al-Sadr has fled to Iran, is correct.

Al-Sadr’s terrorist thugs have clashed with U.S. led coalition forces since it came into existence shortly after Hussein was deposed. It is also one of the main groups fueling ongoing sectarian violence that has escalated after the bombing of the Al-Askari Mosque. it is terrorist organizations, these so called private militia’s, that are causing the most havoc in Iraq and undermining efforts to establish a fully independent and democratic government in Iraq.

The proposed surge of U.S. troops could go a long way in eliminating these groups. This is why in the past weeks there have been many reports of "insurgent" leaders crossing the border into Iran.

Two key members of al-Sadr's political and military organization were gunned down last week, the latest of as many as seven key figures in the al-Sadr organization killed or captured in the past two months.

A close aide who meets regularly with al-Sadr said the cleric was not in Tehran, said the report probably stemmed from a campaign by al-Sadr's people to put out false information about his movements amid fears he will be detained by U.S.-led forces. The cleric also is sleeping in different places each night, the aide said.

Regardless of claims to the contrary and al-Sadr still is in Iraq, any man who lives in hiding in this fashion, sleeping in a different place every night, has got to be up to no good. Otherwise, they would not be in hiding. Al-Sadr has on numerous occasions incited violence in Iraq. With the impending increase in security patrols that are being planned to eliminate many of these terrorist militia organizations, it is no wonder that they are going to ground.

One thing is certain; it is well past time for the Iraqi government to crack down on these criminal militias. If Nouri al-Maliki is serious about leading his nation into the 21st century and establishing liberty and democracy, these militias have to be eliminated, either through disburdenment, incarceration, or militarily.

Tags:

Another American Goes Over To The Enemy

The news is reporting about another "Jonnie bin Walker Lind" working with the enemy. From FoxNews:

An American citizen charged with receiving terrorist training at an Al Qaeda camp in Somalia - including classes in how to become a homicide bomber and "wage violent jihad" - was taken into custody by FBI agents and returned to the U.S. Monday night, Justice Department officials told FOX News.

An indictment unsealed Tuesday by the U.S. Attorney's Office in Houston charges Daniel Joseph Maldanado, 28, a.k.a Daniel Aljughaifi, whose last known address was in Houston, with receiving training from a foreign terrorist organization and conspiring to use an explosive device outside the United States.

The report goes on to state that Maldanado went to Somalia where he joined the Islamic Courts Union (ICU) in 2005. He was issued military gear, including an AK-47 and received weapons and explosives training. Members of al-Qaeda were present in the training camps as well.

What motivated Maldanado to take up arms against the U.S. in the name of radical Islam and Jihad is not as yet known. Nor do we know what he hoped to achieve by joining the terrorists.

If he is convicted, he could receive life in prison. What isn't mentioned is that he could (and should) be stripped of his U.S. citizenship for taking up arms against the U.S. That may be harder to prove as we don't know what his plans were, however, he joined al-Qaeda and that terrorist group of murdering thugs has made it clear that they want to destroy the U.S. and Western civilization.

Tags:

February 12, 2007

YouTube Unwitting Terrorist Hangout

I admit it. I like YouTube. However, terrorists using YouTube to broadcast acts of violence is a problem. From FoxNews:

Anyone with an Internet connection can watch videos of bombings and sniper attacks against U.S. forces - shot and edited by Islamic militants and broadcast on YouTube, the world's largest video-sharing Web site.

With the global spread of high-speed Internet connections and the relative anonymity afforded by the world's biggest and busiest sites, extremists have found a new theater to display violence and anti-American propaganda.

I don't know if YouTube has staff going through and chucking these kinds of videos, at least the ones that are depicting acts of terrorism. I know that such can be flagged for the staff to review and junk. Hopefully they have enough common sense to not allow their servers to be used as a terrorist propaganda and recruiting tool. I don't believe waiting for complaints about any given video to roll in is sufficient. It is reactive, rather than proactive, and can take days before a given video is removed.

Tags:


February 10, 2007

P-47 Thunderbolt

The P-47 Thunderbolt, produced by Republic Aviation Company was another mainstay fighter aircraft of the USAAF during WW2. It entered combat operations in Europe in 1943. Initial B-17 escort missions were limited by the Thunderbolt's fuel capacity, and only able to provide cover for the first part of bmbing missions.

By 1944, the P-47 design had been refined to the point where it was capable of escorting bombers on raids into Germany, and then attacking ground targets on the return home. It is in the role of ground support at which the P-47 excelled the most. In this capacity, the Thunderbolt racked up an incredible record for destroying tanks, locomotives, parked aircraft and trucks. By this point, the P-47 was often loaded with 500 pound bombs for fighter-bomber service, or rockets for ground attack operations.

350_352_353_fg.jpg

P-47s of the 350th, 352nd and 353rd Fighter Groups over Europe.

B-17G-105-44-85784-Sally_b_and_P-47.jpg

P-47 escorting the B-17 Sally B at an air show in 2006.

chief_wahoo.jpg

Chief Wahoo.

p47_firing_rockets.jpg

P-47 attacking ground targets with rockets.

p47_flight2.jpg

P-47 in flight.

p47_flight.jpg

Four P-47s in flight. These Thunderbolts have the bubble canopy developed during the war to provide improved rear visibility.

p47_rocket_tubes.jpg

P-47 with rocket tubes mounted.

p47n.jpg

P-47N with rocket tubes mounted.

Most of these images are from the National Museum of the USAF.

Tags:

Obama: "Take Our Country Back"

One of the things that irritates me the most about the Liberal-Left is their constant whining about the need to "take our country back." Obama has now proved himself to be one of the whiners on the Liberal-Left. From FoxNews:

In a video message on his Web site Friday, Obama said he was launching "a journey to take our country back and change the fundamental nature of our politics."

According to this kind of rhetoric, Obama must mean he wants to take America from freedom loving Americans. It means increases in taxes, government control, welfare, and poverty. It also means abandoning our allies in the Middle East, especially the people of Iraq.

He introduced a bill to prevent President Bush from increasing troop levels in Iraq and to remove U.S. combat forces from the country by March 31, 2008 - legislation that has virtually no chance of becoming law while Bush is president.

Obama was not yet elected to the U.S. Senate when Congress voted to give Bush the authority to go to war, but he gave a speech in 2002 opposing the war. He said Saddam Hussein posed no imminent threat to the United States and predicted the invasion would lead to an occupation with undetermined costs and consequences.

In other words, Obama would happily have left a mass-murdering dictator in power. He would have left the weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and biological weapons remain in the hands of an oppressive regime that has a history of using such weapons against civilian populations. Obama was also okay with Hussein's torture chambers and the rape rooms run by Hussein's sons. It is also possible had Hussein been left in power, we would not only be facing a nuclear armed North Korea, and the developing potential of Iran with nuclear weapons, Iraq would also be in possession of such weapons.

Obama is also the darling of the anti-war crowd, with rhetoric like "What I am opposed to is a dumb war." (Anti-war rally in 2002.) According to Obama, our troops are fighting, and dying, in a dumb war.

Obama's qualifications to lead this country are also lacking. He touts as one of his major qualifications that he has lived in foreign countries (lots of people have, including me) and he has a degree (again, lots of people have degrees). His ego has been pumped up by an easy victory n the 2004 Senate race in which he was virtually unopposed, save for a token effort by a GOP candidate imported to Illinois in order to have a Republican on the ballot in that race. What makes him believe he can pull off a national electoral victory, especially with Hillary in the mix? Perhaps Obama is positioning himself for the number 2 slot.

Obama is a man who has lived the American Dream. It is too bad he doesn't understand what the American Dream is, and that other countries should be helped in shedding the shackles of oppression and tyranny so that they can pursue Liberty as well.

Tags:

February 9, 2007

Reagan May Replace Soviet Monuments

From BreitBart:

Opponents of Poland's former communist regime reportedly want to pay a posthumous homage to US President Ronald Reagan by erecting his statue in the place of a Soviet-era monument.

In an open letter to the mayor of the southwestern city of Katowice, the former anti-regime activists said that the staunchly anti-communist Reagan had been a "symbol of liberty," the Polish news agency PAP reported.

Personally, I can't think of a better man to build a monument to. One of the greatest presidents we've ever had, and he is the man most responsible for the disintegration of the Soviet Empire.

Tags:

Hillary Wants To Seize Oil Company Profits

Looks like Senator Hillary Clinton is making the rounds again, this time want to seize profits from "Big Oil" in order to pay for some of her favorite projects. From Las Vegas Review Journal:

Today, Venezuela has a communist dictator. When Hugo Chavez doesn't like the way things are going with his country's oil, telecommunications and power industries -- or if he merely craves their wealth -- he simply seizes them, calling it "nationalization."

Is that the way many in the American press and public would like to see things done here, despite the wreck that such policies made of Eastern Europe?

… Has Sen. Clinton really changed her tune? Exxon Mobil last week announced that it earned $39.5 billion in 2006, for a profit of about 10 percent -- the most profitable year any company has ever had.

The bulk of that money goes to stockholders who invested in the firm, either directly or through a company 401(k) plan. That profitability offers assurance that the company will keep developing new oil fields and refineries -- where politicians allow them -- to keep us supplied with gasoline and heating oil at historically low rates (once adjusted for inflation.)

But speaking last Friday at the Democratic National Committee's winter meeting in Washington, Sen. Clinton said: "I want to take those profits and put them into an alternative energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart energy, alternatives that will actually begin to move us toward the direction of independence."

According to Investor's Business Daily, she made the remarks "with wide, glowing eyes that suggested the mere thought of taking money that didn't belong to her gave her a thrill."

But, "Threatening to hijack private property in the energy industry is a serious matter," the business daily points out, in a mild understatement. "If (Sen.) Clinton were able to seize profits, shareholders would suffer harm and Americans who use energy -- that's all of us, except maybe Ted Kaczynski in his Unabomber days -- would be saddled with higher prices and lower supplies."

Will set aside Hillary's greed for the sake of big government aside for the moment, although the gleam in her eye when talking about seizing these profits makes for interesting imagery.

To Clinton, and others like her on the Liberal-Left, a 10% profit, much of which is paid out to shareholders (which means most Americans) is an outrage. Yet a 10% profit is not all that unreasonable when you get down to it, and it is a company's duty to return profits to their investors. This is the American way.

Oil is what moves Americans and America, not to mention the rest of the world. It fuels our trucks that move products from one place to another, our cars (although there are some alternatives, like all electric vehicles, however, they have a very limited range), and our aircraft, which allows rapid transit from one region to another, including movement overseas.

Sure, I'd like to see America less dependent on foreign oil imports, however, so called "green" alternatives, such as wind and solar, can't get the job done. And they can't run our transportation. Ethanol, which is also a darling of the Liberal-Left is very inefficient, and expensive. The only reason it is priced lower at the pump is due to all the subsidies that Americans are taxed in order to provide. Even at its lower price at the pump, its lower fuel efficiency makes it moderately more expensive to move your car than regular gasoline.

There are answers to the energy question: nuclear energy technology has vastly improved over the last several decades; there are also untapped oil reserves within our borders, such as ANWR, as well as within reach on the outer continental shelf.

Instead of allowing oil companies to explore these fields, or leveraging nuclear technology, Hillary and the Liberal-Left continue to hogtie America, forcing it to be dependent on foreign imports. Or pushing Americans to use less energy, thus reducing our standard of living and having a negative influence on our economy.

Tags:

Iran Threatens U.S. Interests, Again

More Rhetoric from the totalitarian regime in Iran. From News 24:

A top Iranian cleric said on Friday the United States was within Iran's "firing range", a day after supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei vowed to hit back at US interests worldwide if attacked.

"Americans have surrounded us but it works to our advantage. They are within our firing range in the east, west and elsewhere," Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati said in his Friday prayer sermon carried live on state radio.

He was referring to the US military presence in neighbouring Iraq and Afghanistan as well as in the Gulf waters off southern Iran.

It is amazing how much the leaders in Iran sound like Baghdad Bob before and during Operation: Liberate Iraq in 2003. I guess he must have opened a propaganda school or is consulting with Iran n how to bloviate with the best of them.

Currently, there are no plans from the U.S. to invade Iran. Okay, more likely there are some plans on how to do it if the need arose, however, there are no intentions of executing such plans.

Meanwhile, Iran continues to posture as the "wounded victim" of "American aggression," and push hard on developing nuclear technology, and getting closer to either developing a nuclear weapon, or being able to produce sufficient quantities to pass of to terrorist organizations such as al-Qaeda and Hezbollah who are more than willing to use it to attack Israel, the United States and other Western nations.

"In the worst situations we are able to turn the region into burning hell and take the possibility of using the Persian Gulf away from them forever," Rear Admiral Mohammad Ebrahim Dehghani said, quoted by semi-official Mehr news agency.

Is this guy hinting that they plan on using newly developed nuclear weapons, or threatening the use of chemical and biological weapons, or merely posturing. It's hard to say, as well as dangerous to guess, especially to guess wrong.

We need to take the question of Iran's nuclear enrichment programs far more seriously than we are. Doing otherwise could be disastrous.

Tags:

Global Warming: Loons Gone Wild 1

Global Warming seems to be the hottest topic in the news right now. Virgin Airlines Branson is now offering $25 Million to any one who can come up with a means from eliminating CO2 from the atmosphere. From Reuters:

Flanked by climate campaigners former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and British ex-diplomat Crispin Tickell, Branson said he hoped the prize would spur innovative and creative thought to save mankind from self-destruction.

"Man created the problem and therefore man should solve the problem," he told a news conference to reveal the Virgin Earth Challenge.

"Unless we can devise a way of removing CO2 (carbon dioxide) from the earth's atmosphere we will lose half of all species on earth, all the coral reefs, 100 million people will be displaced, farmlands will become deserts and rain forests wastelands."

Now this is lunacy at its highest point. Branson wants to remove all CO2 from the atmosphere. He uses fear tactics that death, destruction and extinction will result if we don't. Never mind the fact that all life on Earth is dependent on CO2, and removing it from the atmosphere is not only impossible (all living creatures exhale CO2 and plants use CO2 as part of its biological functions), eliminating all CO2 would end life on Earth. Plant life cannot function without CO2 in the atmosphere.

Yeesh!

Tags:

Goodman Stoops To Name Calling Over Global Warming Debate

Ellen Goodman, writing for Boston Globe has come out and said it straight out: those who do not accept that mankind is to blame for the current warming trend the Earth is experiencing are no better than Holocaust deniers. From her column:

I would like to say we're at a point where global warming is impossible to deny. Let's just say that global warming deniers are now on a par with Holocaust deniers, though one denies the past and the other denies the present and future.

Those of us who question the validity of the U.N.'s "blame America, er, Mankind" global warming claims are doing so based on the historic and geographic evidence found in ice cores from Greenland to Antarctica and sediment cores from Ireland to the coast of Africa. There are literally hundreds of scientists that question the claims from the Left that it is due to CO2 emissions and it's all Man's fault.

Goodman would be well advised to look at the geological record as Avery and Singer have done in their new book, Unstoppable Global Warming. Some of the researchers analyzing the geological record include Willi Dansgaard of Denmark and Hans Oeschger of Switzerland, who are the first to analyze such ice cores, the first series providing some 250,000 years worth of data.

The Greenland ice core data has been corroborated by data from the analysis of samples taken from other points around the globe.

That the Left is resorting to such despicable name calling tactics is no surprise. It is a clear attempt to squelch real science in order to push threw their agenda that the current warming trend, which began at the conclusion of the Little Ice Age, is our fault. Instead, she is guilty of drinking the Kool-Aid like the rest of the Liberal-Left and the Main Stream Media.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

The science is readily available, in publications and on the net. Perhaps Ms. Goodman should take the time to study the topic of climate change as I am doing. Of course, I seriously doubt she will, as she is focused on replacing her light bulbs with compact fluorescent bulbs (she says she has three; I have over 20 such bulbs…most of the lights inside my house are fluorescent lights).

She goes on (and on and on):

This great divide comes from the science-be-damned-and-debunked attitude of the Bush administration and its favorite media outlets. The day of the report, Big Oil Senator James Inhofe of Oklahoma actually described it as "a shining example of the corruption of science for political gain." Speaking of corruption of science, the American Enterprise Institute, which has gotten $1.6 million over the years from Exxon Mobil, offered $10,000 last summer to scientists who would counter the IPCC report.

Inhofe is right in his description of the IPCC report. It ignores the research of many scientists in regards to climate change, uses skewed data from ground stations to measure the Earth's temperature, as opposed to weather balloons and satellite data and filtering out the data from heat sinks at airports and large cities. It focuses on computer models used to "prove" it is CO2 emissions driving the arming trend, despite the fact that CO2 is a trace gas in the atmosphere. It ignores solar activity and the geologic record. It ignores the impact of cosmic rays and other forces in the solar and galactic neighborhood. It ignores variations of the Earth's orbit, which has a 100,000 year cycle. It ignores shifts in the Earth's tilt and its "wobble" as it rotates, both of which have their cycles that influence climate. It also ignores the overwhelming influence of water vapor in the atmosphere which has a greater impact on a greenhouse effect that a trace gas such as CO2.

As for the AEI providing money to any scientist who refutes the IPCC, how is that corrupting science? The U.N. has provided how many millions (or is it billions) of dollars (our TAX dollars at that!) to scientists to claim it's all Man's fault, and for political gain? Especially since the "it's Man's fault" pseudo-science has been disproved as early as 1983, before the current hysteria about CO2 came into focus.

The U.N. for some time now has been a highly questionable organization, plagued by corruption; as such, why should we believe any of their claims where the current warming trend is concerned?

Tags:

February 8, 2007

Super Wealthy Presidential Candidates

From Yahoo News:

Democrat John Edwards, who has made an anti-poverty message the theme of his 2008 presidential campaign, is taking heat for the lavish home he has constructed in Orange County, N.C.

In December, Edwards chose the modest backyard of a New Orleans woman who had lost her home to Hurricane Katrina as the image that best underscored his campaign theme.

Now voters are seeing another, sharply contrasting image of Edwards: his own home.

Sitting on 102 secluded acres — surrounded by trees and defended by no-trespassing signs — the 28,000-square-foot estate that Edwards and his family call home has presidential privacy.

A main home has five bedrooms and six-and-a-half baths. It's connected by a covered walkway to a bright red addition known as "The Barn," that includes its own living facilities along with a handball court, an indoor pool and an indoor basketball court with a stage at one end. Nearby, the family has cleared space for a soccer field.

With a current building value of $4.3 million, the unfinished Edwards estate is already about $1 million more expensive than any other house in the county, according to tax records. It sits on land worth about $1.1 million.

Edwards first purchased the land in 2004, during his failed run as vice president. He recently sold his mansion in Washington's tony Georgetown neighborhood for $5.2 million.

It must be nice to have that kind of wealth. Living on 102 acres would be fine if it were a working farm or ranch, but just to show off your immense wealth? And then claiming to be for the poor. Right!

What's even better about the piece is that the guy who lives across the street placed a Guiliani sign right there by the driveway, so that Edwards, or at least his chauffuer, will have to look at it everyday.

Tags:

Can We Win In Iraq

Steve Chapman has a very weird analogy on the continued U.S. operations in Iraq. From the Red Star Tribune:

When police found Shawn Hornbeck living with his alleged abductor four years after he was kidnapped, the question arose: Why didn't the 15-year-old simply run away? But trapped and isolated, a hostage can be scared into thinking that the consequences of leaving -- for himself or his loved ones -- would be far worse than the consequences of staying. So he passes up opportunities to escape.

I really don't get what the kidnapping of Hornbeck and his failure to use "opportunities to escape" has to do with the establishment of a functioning Democracy in Iraq.

Chapman then gets into the thrust of his editorial:

That's roughly our plight in Iraq. Even one of President Bush's key allies, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., says "the situation in Iraq can now best be described as dire and deteriorating" and "our window of opportunity to reverse momentum may be closing." Hard-core supporters of the war, no longer able to pretend that we are making progress toward a stable, democratic Iraq, have fallen back to their last line of defense -- insisting that no matter how bad things are with us in Iraq, things would be far worse with us out.

Well, no, we are not being held hostage in Iraq. On the flip side, he is right about the support for continued operations in Iraq is a bit lagging of late, mostly on the part of those who have announced plans to run for the presidency in '08. Like McCain.

Whether or not the "window of opportunity" is closing is true, there is no doubt that the right strategy in Iraq can succeed. The right strategy goes beyond the obvious "surge" in troop deployments in Baghdad and elsewhere in Iraq. Even reaching out to the people of Iraq and the reconstruction of the nation's infrastructure may not be sufficient, as we have been doing since 2003. We need to make it such that Iraqi's feel secure enough that they can identify terrorists and sectarian death squad members without fear of reprisal against them and their families. As long as they live with that fear, that turning in a terrorist will result in the death of their entire family, it is difficult to make any real headway.

Pulling out, the argument goes, would destroy our credibility and embolden the terrorists. Neoconservative Robert Kagan of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is among those confidently predicting a parade of horribles: ethnic slaughter, a regional war and a secure base for Al-Qaida to launch attacks on us and our allies.

If we withdraw, he wrote recently in the Washington Post, "the war in Iraq and in the region will not end but will only grow more dangerous." And there is the old argument that if we don't fight the terrorists in Iraq, we will have to fight them at home.

These points, contrary to what Chapman would have us believe, are true. The sectarian violence will continue, fueled by Iran. Iran may even cease its covert operations and openly move to convert Iraq into a totalitarian theocracy like itself, making Iraq a satellite state. Possible? Probable!

Once that is done, al-Qaeda will have a new base of operations, having won the waiting game with the U.S. as Congress continues to show a lack of backbone to do the heavy lifting necessary to create a stable and democratic Iraq.

We know that al-Qaeda, and recently, Hezbollah, has cells operating in the U.S. Once the U.S. ends operations in Iraq, these terror groups will be able to focus on their operations in America and other Western nations. They will also have a fall back position in Iraq should things turn sour. They will also have a supplier of nuclear materials with which to build small nukes that can kill hundreds of thousands of people in a single attack.

There will also be the stockpiles of weaponry still in Iraq that have not been fully inventoried, from which over 500 chemical weapons have been identified, recovered, and destroyed since 2003. How many more chemical weapons remain in Iraq is unknown.

Winning in Iraq is not an option, nor is it a luxury we can't afford. It is a necessity. The enemy fears a democratic state in their midst, and that is why the road to success has grown more difficult.

It also has not helped that we brokered a deal with Muqtada al-Sadr and his gang of thugs in 2004.

It won't be cheap. Victory never is. Not in blood, nor in money. I care about the loss of life. As for the money, spend whatever it takes to get it done. The key, though, is making Iraq safe for the people of Iraq so that they will not live in fear for their lives. Once that is achieved, a free and stable Iraq can be achieved.

Tags:

February 7, 2007

Oregon Gov. Wants To Fire Climatoligist

I’ve known that Oregon has been part of the Loony-Left for sometime now, however, it wasn’t until today I knew how far to the left that state is. From KGW News Channel 8:

In the face of evidence agreed upon by hundreds of climate scientists, George Taylor holds firm. He does not believe human activities are the main cause of global climate change.

Taylor also holds a unique title: State Climatologist.

Hundreds of scientists last Friday issued the strongest warning yet on global warming saying humans are "very likely" the cause.

"Most of the climate changes we have seen up until now have been a result of natural variations," Taylor asserts.

This is the problem when science is perverted for political reasons. View points that are counter to the popular view are silenced through a variety of means, from blackballing meteorologists, as has been floated by Cullen of the Weather Channel, to calling them “deniers” which carries the negative association with “holocaust deniers.”

Those on the left are making it more apparent that they have no interest in the real science being performed in the U.S. and abroad, only pushing their agenda of controlling the world’s populations and keeping the poorest of the poor living in near stone-age type conditions. It also satisfies they unwarranted belief that oil is evil.

Taylor is a scientist. He understands the difference between theory and fact. And the fact is global warming is part of a natural cycle that has been occurring since the Earth formed 4.5 billion years ago. Man caused global warming is nothing more than theory that has not only failed to provide proof of validity, geological samples taken from Greenland to Antarctica prove that the popular theory is nothing more than junk science politicized to fuel hysteria.

When science is politicized, as is being down with the current warming trend of the Earth’s climate, everyone loses. The scientists whose research is unjustly squelched; the people denied access to adequate power sources; and Western civilization as it gets taxed into oblivion in an effort to stop the unstoppable.

Plug: Read Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 Years by Dennis T. Avery and S. Fred Singer. I am a good chunk into it, and it is one good read.

Tags:

Border Agent Assaulted In Prison

Somehow, I am not surprised to learn that one of the border patrol agents now serving time for his involvment in the shooting of a drug smuggler has been assaulted while serving his sentence. From FoxNews:

One of two former Border Patrol agents sentenced to more than a decade in prison for shooting and wounding a suspected Mexican drug smuggler was beaten by a group of inmates last weekend, a Texas congressman confirmed Tuesday to FOXNews.com.

Ignacio Ramos, who was transferred to the Yazoo City Federal Correctional Complex in Mississippi last month to begin serving his 12-year sentence for the February 2005 shooting of Osbaldo Aldrete-Davila, was placed in a special housing unit after the incident pending an investigation, according to T.J. Bonner, president of the National Border Patrol Council.

From Grassfire.org:

Less than one week after being transfered to a federal prison, Ignacio "Nacho" Ramos was severely beaten by as many as five illegal immigrants who, during that attack shouted, "Death to the Border Agent!"

These two agents were only doing their job, and it is an outrage that the drug smuggler in this incident, who was attempting to bring 800 pounds of drugs into the U.S., was sought out by Federal Agents in order to prosecute Ramos and Compean.

By allowing their convictions to stand, the U.S. sends a signal to smugglers and terrorists that they have free reign to violate our borders and destroy the careers of our law enforcement agents. It also tells our Border Agents that the U.S. will not stand by them in the aftermath of a shooting when drug smugglers are involved. With signals like that, it makes their job harder, and more dangerous.

Please consider signing the petition to pardon these two agents at grassfire.org.

Tags:

Hezbollah Rearming, Courtesy Iran and Syria

Speaking of Hezbollah and Iran, this is off of FoxNews:

Hezbollah is presently receiving a "constant stream of armaments" from Syria, Iran and other foreign sources, senior Israeli officials said Tuesday, and the terror group is "preparing for violence" in an increasingly radicalized Middle East.

"They are getting all kinds of rockets, advanced anti-tank missiles, command-and-control systems, training, finance," an Israeli official said. Asked if the group has fully reconstituted back to where it was before the war in terms of military capability, the official said: "They are certainly on their way."

This is a serious problem for Israel. There is no doubt that militarily, Hezbollah can’t stand up to the IDF in a toe-to-toe fight. That’s a trend I hope continues. However, the buildup is disturbing as it threatens to continue the destabilizing influence in Lebanon.

Enabling Hezbollah's rearmament, the official said, is the "open border" Lebanon shares with Syria, and the lack of "real teeth for enforcement" in U.N. Security Council Resolution 1718, which established a ceasefire in the Israeli-Hezbollah war last August.

And, of course, the Liberal-Left’s darling, the United Nations, is a no show on enforcing its resolution that brought about the ceasefire last year.

I don’t know what it’s going to take to bring peace and stability to the Middle East, but it is obvious to me that the U.N. hasn’t got the answers. Maybe next time we should go ahead and let Israel finish the job. But I don’t think that will solve the problems over there, either.

There artivle continues with current activities in Gaza and internecine violence between Hamas and Fatah.

Tags:


February 6, 2007

Happy Birthday, Ronald

Ronald Reagan was born on this day in 1911. I had the great fortune to grow up in California while he served as Governor. Later, I had the great honor of serving in the USAF with Reagan as my Commander In Chief.

He is without any doubt, the best president the Unite States has had in my lifetime.

I only wish we had more leaders like him.

More Rhetoric From Iran

Iran is back in focus, spewing a lot of rhetoric about how the U.S. will be made to "repent" an attack on Iran. This is straight from the horse’s mouth, the Islamic Republic News Agency:

Defense Minister Mostafa Mohammad-Najjar said that Iran is fully prepared to teach a lesson to possible aggressors to make them repent of such a measure forever.

It sounds as though Baghdad Bob has changed his name and moved to Iran. Invading Afghanistan to go after al-Qaeda was predicted that it would be a disaster, just as Soviet invasion of Aghanistan was in the ‘80s. Hussein, during the build up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq that led to the fall of his regime (and eventual execution) also predicted that the U.S. would pay dearly should it invade.

Okay, we’re still struggling to counter the sectarian violence in Iraq. Hopefully "the surge" will have a significant and positive impact on the continuing violence there.

The article gets better:

Underlining Iran's interest in regional security and peace, he said that Iran's policy is clear and that Iran has repeatedly said hat security should be established by the countries of the region.

This is laughable. Iran has gone to great lengths to undermine the developing sovereignty of a democratic Iraq by fueling the sectarian violence there. They have not only provided arms and munitions, but also manpower to the terrorist death squads operating in Iraq.

It is clear to me that "security should be established by the countries of the region" they mean Iran, and a totalitarian theocracy.

About the United Nations Security Council's anti-Iran resolution and the extent of its impact on Iran's military industries, he said that today most of Iranian Army's weapons are produced domestically and that Iran no more needs to supply its weapons from foreign markets.

If that were truly the case, then why Iran been buying military hardware from Russia and trying to acquire F-14 parts through clandestine channels?

Their continued insistence on developing nuclear technology is a serious concerned that only fools would ignore. Although they claim they are developing nuclear tech for peaceful energy usage, can they be trusted?

It was not all that long ago that North Korea was spouting similar rhetoric in regards to nuclear technology that the U.S. gave them, accepting Kim Jong Il at his word (which we know what that’s worth) that the North Koreans would not use it to develop nuclear weapons.

Iran poses an even greater threat in this space, as they have been funneling weapons and funding to numerous terrorist organizations, most notably Hezbollah. They do not have to develop a nuke that has to be delivered via missile when terrorist groups will gladly do the job for them.

Despite its claims to the contrary, Iran is currently the biggest threat to peace and security in the region. It continues to fuel sectarian violence in Iraq as well as equipping, funding and training Hezbollah in its continued war on Israel. Who in their right mind would trust such a regime?

Tags:

MO State Senator Wants To Send Kids To Prison

How many people remember the TV documentary "Scared Straight" from the '70s? It was meant to scare kids into good behavior, and show them that "crime doesn't pay." Looks like a Missouri State Senator wants to take it a step further by requiring all 9th graders to tour a correctional facility before entering the 10th grade. From FoxNews:

Sen. Tim Green, D-St. Louis, has introduced a bill requiring public school ninth-graders tour a state correctional center before they start their sophomore year, the Columbia Tribune reported.

The tactic, meant to scare kids into good behavior, would start in the 2009-2010 school year. Principals and superintendents who do not comply would face being fired.

The goal is to "show them that crime doesn't pay," Green said. "We have a lot of forks in the road in our lives. One bad decision can ruin a young person's entire life.

There are two problems that I can see.

First, good behavior in children needs to be instilled by the parents. If parents are not teaching their children the difference between right and wrong, then making them tour correctional facilities is not going to be much, if any, help.

Second, the films and television programs being pumped out of Hollywood today is one of "Yes, crime pays. Big." I am talking about films like Cloony's remake of Ocean Eleven; then there is Bandits and The Whole Nine Yards to name a few films. Then there is the series Kingpin that depicts a Mexican drug cartel.

As long as Hollywood continues to pump out films and TV programs like these, it becomes even more important, even critical, for parents to be fully involved in the upbringing of their children, in order to counter the messages coming out of Hollywood, as well as have an impact on reducing crime in America.

February 5, 2007

Proposed Vikings Stadium Could Be Very Taxing

As if ramming a stadium tax down the throats of Hennepin County voters wasn't bad enough, the Vikings want to tax all metro counties. From the Star Tribune:

Gov. Tim Pawlenty clipped the wings off the latest concept for building a new Minnesota Vikings stadium, saying Monday there is no political support for a seven-county metrowide sales tax to finance a $900 million stadium with a retractable roof.

Such a tax "isn't going to fly," Pawlenty told reporters in response to questions after an event in St. Paul. "The counties aren't going to support it. The people in the metro region aren't going to support it. I'm not going to support it."

Pawlenty also said the Vikings are "in a real pickle" because they don't have a host community where public officials are united in accepting the financing burden.

Pawlenty has been veering a bit to the left lately, so reading that he plans to say no to any 7-county tax for a Vikings stadium is a breath of fresh air.

I admit that I am not a big spectator sports fan, except for women's beach volleyball, and the Olympics, so I really don't care where they build the stadium, as long as I am not forced to pay for it.

The biggest problem with these stadiums is that the franchise owners have grown accustomed to using various extortionistic tactics (build us a stadium or we'll move to another state) to get their way. Instead, I would really like to see these owners do something creative: pay for the stadiums themselves. It is, after all, a business investment.

Unfortunately, since the 1950s, they have grown accustomed to being able to pressure communities to tax their citizens in order to build their playgrounds for their million players. In a way, it's disgusting, as even the lowest played professional athlete makes many more times in salary than the average citizen they expect to foot the bill for these stadiums. Add to that the fact that these buildings are not much more than white elephants; anchors around the necks of the communities that build them.

I wish Pawlenty had had the cojones to say no to the Twins last year. Unfortunately, he lent them to Carl Pohlad instead.

Tags:

Rhythm of Honor CD

Rhythm of Honor is a compilation CD produced by Janet Fisher of Goodnight Kiss. It is a tribute to the men and women of the American Armed Forces. Many of the songs were written and performed by men and women who have served, or have some other close affiliation with the Armed Forces.

The first track, "Ain't Nobody To Dance With," by Rod Henderson (Vietnam Veteran), opens with a few bars from the "Star Spangled Banner," then transitions to a few bars from "When Johnny Comes Marching Home," before it makes the final transition to a Motown rock song. It is a tribute to the troops serving in both Afghanistan and Iraq.

Another favorite track is "My Kind of Man" by Courtney Leigh Heins & Bryan Dobbs, which has a bit of a country feel to it as it rock's out. Entertaining lyrics and excellent vocal deliveries as she sings about what is her kind of man.

"A Ballad of Junior" by Alton Rex is the heartfelt ballad that tells the true story of one man who returned from war, in this case World War 2, and how it changed him forever. It is a sad, but very moving song about Rex's uncle. Rex served in the Navy before turning to songwriting. He regularly performs free concerts for veterans at VA hospitals.

The eleven songs that make up Rhythm of Honor are a worthy tribute to all who serve their country.

Goodnight Kiss is donating 50 cents from the sale of every CD to the Wounded Warriors Hospital Fund, which provides support to the families of soldiers wounded or killed in combat operations.

Tags:

Global Warming: Natural Causes #1

Astrophysicist Nir Shariv has outlined how Global Warming is man-caused came about in a recent article published on Canada's National Post. Scientists use carbon dioxide to explain a greenhouse effect; then the climate warms; no other apparent cause for the warming is present.

The problem with this process is that many variables that impact the Earth's climate have been ignored.

From the Canada's National Post:

All we have on which to pin the blame on greenhouse gases, says Dr. Shaviv, is "incriminating circumstantial evidence," which explains why climate scientists speak in terms of finding "evidence of fingerprints." Circumstantial evidence might be a fine basis on which to justify reducing greenhouse gases, he adds, "without other 'suspects.' " However, Dr. Shaviv not only believes there are credible "other suspects," he believes that at least one provides a superior explanation for the 20th century's warming.


"Solar activity can explain a large part of the 20th-century global warming," he states, particularly because of the evidence that has been accumulating over the past decade of the strong relationship that cosmic- ray flux has on our atmosphere. So much evidence has by now been amassed, in fact, that "it is unlikely that [the solar climate link] does not exist."

The sun's strong role indicates that greenhouse gases can't have much of an influence on the climate -- that C02 et al. don't dominate through some kind of leveraging effect that makes them especially potent drivers of climate change. The upshot of the Earth not being unduly sensitive to greenhouse gases is that neither increases nor cutbacks in future C02 emissions will matter much in terms of the climate.

Even doubling the amount of CO2 by 2100, for example, "will not dramatically increase the global temperature," Dr. Shaviv states. Put another way: "Even if we halved the CO2 output, and the CO2 increase by 2100 would be, say, a 50% increase relative to today instead of a doubled amount, the expected reduction in the rise of global temperature would be less than 0.5C. This is not significant."

The evidence from astrophysicists and cosmologists in laboratories around the world, on the other hand, could well be significant. In his study of meteorites, published in the prestigious journal, Physical Review Letters, Dr. Shaviv found that the meteorites that Earth collected during its passage through the arms of the Milky Way sustained up to 10% more cosmic ray damage than others. That kind of cosmic ray variation, Dr. Shaviv believes, could alter global temperatures by as much as 15% --sufficient to turn the ice ages on or off and evidence of the extent to which cosmic forces influence Earth's climate.(emphasis added-Sqotty)

In another study, directly relevant to today's climate controversy, Dr. Shaviv reconstructed the temperature on Earth over the past 550 million years to find that cosmic ray flux variations explain more than two-thirds of Earth's temperature variance, making it the most dominant climate driver over geological time scales. The study also found that an upper limit can be placed on the relative role of CO2 as a climate driver, meaning that a large fraction of the global warming witnessed over the past century could not be due to CO2 -- instead it is attributable to the increased solar activity.

CO2 does play a role in climate, Dr. Shaviv believes, but a secondary role, one too small to preoccupy policymakers. Yet Dr. Shaviv also believes fossil fuels should be controlled, not because of their adverse affects on climate but to curb pollution.

Cosmic Rays having a large impact on the climate is a new theory to me. And appears to have a fair amount of validity.

CO2 is only a minor gas in the atmosphere, accounting for .037%, while greenhouse gases account for a total of 3%. (from Friends of Science) Not a lot. Plus CO2 is necessary for all life on Earth, so it is not surprising that there is some amount in the atmosphere. Without it, all life would cease to exist.

Shaviv goes on to state that he supports various alternative energy usage; wind, solar and fusion (if we ever achieve it). Surprisingly, he ignores fission, which has come a long ways since the '60s (but that's another story). These technologies should be implemented, especially nuclear energy, despite the fact that reducing carbon emissions will not change the current warming trends of the Earth's climate.

There is also mounting evidence that solar activity, especially sunspots, has a significant impact on the Earth's climate. Despite these trends in the scientific community, the U.N. IPCC report, and the bulk of the Main Stream Media ignore these facts.

Tags:

February 3, 2007

Amidst the Bombings, A New School Opens in Iraq

It's been another bad day in Baghdad, as a suicide bomber driving a truck loaded with a ton of explosives. set off his bomb in a busy Shiite market place, killing an estimated 121 people. This attack took place in advance of impending U.S. lead security sweeps and increased military presence. From the Star Tribune:

Many of the injured from the market blast were driven to overwhelmed hospitals in pickup trucks and angry young men lifted bodies onto stretchers. The Kindi hospital, Baghdad's main emergency facility, quickly filled had to start refusing patients, asking ambulances to take them elsewhere.

"It was a strong blow. A car exploded. I fell on the ground," said one young man with a bandaged head, his face still streaked with blood.

Police and hospital officials said at least 121 people were killed and 226 wounded. The Health Ministry put the figure at 105 killed and 331 wounded.

This was a major attack, designed to prompt even more sectarian violence. It was followed up by a mortar attack on a Sunni neighborhood in which 2 people were killed, and about 20 more injured.

There is, however, some bit of good news out of Iraq as the ribbon was cut on a new school in Al Salamiyah. From Mutli-National Force Iraq:

Soldiers from the 4th Brigade, 2nd Iraqi Army Division partnered with civil affairs teams and Soldiers from the 2nd Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division, in celebrating the completion of an $88,500 renovation project at Salamiyah Primary School on Jan. 31. Brig. Gen. Noraddeen, commander of 4-2 IA, and Ahmed Esad, mayor of Al Salamiyah, presided over the ribbon-cutting ceremony. Both men took a tour of the renovated school and spoke with students and teachers immediately after the event.

These kinds of activities continue to be ignored by the main stream media, however, they are just as important, if not more so, as it depicts the positive efforts going on to stabilize Iraq. There is regular reports similar to this on the Multi-National Force site. It is worth checking on a regular basis, as this kind of information rarely makes it into the major news outlets. Yet, it is important to know that the news from Iraq is not all doom and gloom.

It is possible to win in Iraq, and to establish a truly democratic society. It will be a long, hard road, and very expensive, not just in money, but in human life as well. I have no doubt, though, that the benefits, when they are realized, will outweigh the costs. Regardless of the outcome, it will be hard to justify to those who have lost loved ones in Iraq, and to those that have paid the price with their blood.

Tags:

Photos of qraS

It was just a couple of weeks ago that I posted a piece on the passing of my friend Sally. Since that time I have dug up a few photos of her in her Klingon getup, from when I still lived in California.

Sally Field was known as qraS amongst the Klingons. Later, she became involved in the Renaisance Faire as well.

These photos are from 1996 and 1997.

macys_dorn.jpg
At Macy's with Michael Dorn. Sally is in front on the right, and I am just behind her on the right.

mass_klingons1.jpg
Mass Klingons with Feddies at an event in 1996. Sally is on the right end, holding a cabbage patch Klingon doll.

mass_klingons2.jpg
Mass Klingons at an event in 1996. Sally is on the right end, holding a cabbage patch Klingon doll.

This next series is all from BayCon 1997 during a Klingon Martial Arts demo.
klingon_ma_1.jpg
klingon_ma_2.jpg
klingon_ma_4.jpg

Sally was a fine person, and she is dearly missed by all who knew her.

P-51 Mustangs

The P-51 Mustang is, without any doubt, my favorite fighter aircraft of all time. It is a sleek aircraft, and powerful. One of the major roles it played in WW2 was as an escort for bombers on long range missions into Germany, ensuring Allied air superiority over the enemy.

The P-51A and B models were armed with four .50 machine guns in the wings, while later models were armed with six .50 machine guns in the wings. With a speed of 390 mph for early models and 437 for the P-51d model, it was a formidable aircraft, and capable of knocking down the Me-262 jet fighters that Germany put into action late in the war.

Its internal fuel capacity, combined with external fuel tanks, gave the P-51 the range needed to escort bombers all the way to Germany and back.

The P-51 also became the signature aircraft of the Tuskegee Airmen, the all-black fighter squadron that earned the reputation of never having lost a bomber that they escorted. They were commonly known as "Redtails" due to the red paint on the vertical stabilizers on their aircraft.

miss_pea_ridge.jpg
P-51 "Miss Pea Ridge" in the air.

p51_flight2.jpg
P-51 in flight with invasion stripes.

p51_flight3.jpg
P-51 in flight with invasion stripes on fuselage belly.

p51_flight.jpg
P-51 in th air, from directly above.

peg_o_my_heart.jpg
P-51 "Peg O' My Heart."

tuskegee_p51.jpg
Some of the Tusgekee Airmen with P-51.

yeagers_p51.jpg
Chuck Yeager's P-51, "Glamorous Glen III" with external fuel tanks mounted and sporting 12 kill flags.

Photo sources: Warbirds Resource Group and Air Force Histoical Research Agency

Tags:

February 2, 2007

Thoughts On Global Warming

With the impending publication of a new U.N. report that puts the blame for Global Warming on mankind, along with Al Gore being nominated for a Nobel Prize for his work on Global Warming, there has been a great deal written on the subject.

The Liberal-Left, which controls much of the media and other sources of information and research, have been pushing climate change as being a man-made phenomenon, rather than a natural planetary cycle. They even use hostile rhetoric towards those who take positions contrary to their "it's all man's fault" attitude.

Climate change is natural and ongoing. It was only about forty years ago that there was a huge clamor that the Earth was entering another ice age. Now the sky is falling, and they are concerned about the current warming trend, without looking at all of the facts, not to mention all the variables that impact the Earth's climate.

They use images of polar bears stranded on ice floes, some of which have drowned as they drifted to far from shore. Sad as this is, one must remember that polar bears survived the last warming period that occurred at the time when the Vikings explored much of the Northern Atlantic when the Earth's average surface temperature was much higher than it is today. At that point in time, and up until about the 14th century, it was possible to grow crops in Greenland. At this same time, there is evidence that citrus was grown in Mongolia. Currently, Mongolia is unable to support the farming of citrus fruit. The end of the Viking Age and agriculture in Greenland coincides with the beginning of the Little Ice Age, a period of global cooling that lasted for several hundred years, and gave way to the current warming trend that the Earth is now experiencing.

The computer models used to predict future climate conditions are only as good as the data that is used. It is only recently that they began to incorporate clouds and ocean currents into these models. What about the impact of solar flares, sun spot activity, cosmic rays, gravitational effects from the solar neighborhood, variations in the Earth's orbit, and the list goes on for extra-planetary influences on the climate. Then there are those of terrestrial nature that may not be accounted for, such has shifts of the tectonic plates that make up the Earth's continents, volcanic activity which is highly variable and unpredictable over large time spans. How can these changes be accurately modeled when there are so many variations in these activities that influence the climate? Bottom line, the data used in these models can be manipulated to return any set of desired results, thus "proving" whatever it is that the people involved want to "prove."

The Earth's warming is a natural phenomenon. There isn't anything we can do about, and there is no valid proof that mankind is causing it. It may well bring the extinction of many species, and not just polar bears, and that is a regrettable side effect. On the flip side, agriculture will spread into areas that are currently unfarmable, thus enabling us to feed the world's population, and we may even see evolution in action over the next million years or so.

Chirac Threatens To Extort Kyoto Adoption

President Chirac of France has announced intentions to use extortionary tactics against the United States if the U.S. does not sign the Kyoto climate protocol as well as other future agreements concerning Global Warming. From the NYTimes:

But he warned that if the United States did not sign the agreements, a carbon tax across Europe on imports from nations that have not signed the Kyoto treaty could be imposed to try to force compliance. The European Union is the largest export market for American goods.

"A carbon tax is inevitable," Mr. Chirac said. "If it is European, and I believe it will be European, then it will all the same have a certain influence because it means that all the countries that do not accept the minimum obligations will be obliged to pay."

Trade lawyers have been divided over the legality of a carbon tax, with some saying it would run counter to international trade rules. But Mr. Chirac said other European countries would back it. "I believe we will have all of the European Union," he said.

Since the U.S. recognizes that Kyoto is nothing more than a U.N. sponsored tax on the U.S., as well as being an anchor on our economy, the threat of a carbon tax on U.S. goods is pure extortion to force the U.S., and other countries, into a bad deal.

Quite frankly, if France and the rest of the E.U. does use such a tactic as a "carbon tax" to extort more money from U.S. businesses, then it would only be appropriate to implement a counter tax that can be used to provide credits to businesses that do business in the E.U. to make up the difference. Otherwise, the price of U.S. goods would be higher than they currently are as business always passes such expenses on to the consumers.

Either way, such tactics are damaging both to business and to consumers, not to mention the average working joe who gets caught in the middle of such tactics, and is put at risk of losing his job.

Tags:

Iraqi Generals Investigated For Attack On American Soldiers

This is disturbing news out of Iraq. From FoxNews:

Several Iraqis have been detained for questioning in the ongoing investigation of at least two senior Iraqi generals suspected of involvement in an insurgent attack that killed five American soldiers on Jan. 20, U.S. officials told FOX News on Thursday.

The attack occurred at a provincial government security compound in Karbala where the Americans were meeting with local Iraqi security officers. Gunmen stormed the facility dressed like American soldiers and driving SUVs, military officials in Iraq said.

The Pentagon has called this a sophisticated and troubling assault and much more orchestrated than the usual attacks on U.S. and Iraqi forces. Because of that, military officials say they have strong suspicions that the Iranian government or elements of it may have been involved. Four of the five American soldiers were abducted before being shot execution style.

The piece goes on to describe the attack in some detail. The murdering thugs were wearing new U.S. Army fatigues, and carrying American military weapons and equipment. They spoke English and the SUVs used were of a type typically used in convoys.

There is a probability that the two generals under investigation may have at least had advance word of the attack, possibly even directly involved as the attack showed a level of detail knowledge that neither al-Qaeda or the various death squads would otherwise have. One of the Iraqi generals under investigation is an intelligence office, and that makes the situation even more troubling.

If we can't rely on the Iraqi military leadership, then the situation in Iraq is in serious trouble.

Tags:

February 1, 2007

Ahmadinejad Pushing More Nuke Tech In Iran

Looks like Iran and its nuclear program is in focus again. Ahmadinedjad has made it clear that Iran intends to bring 3,000 more centrifuges online during the month of February. From MyWay news:

Ahmadinejad's remarks Thursday signaled that Iran would begin the installation before Feb. 11 - the final day of nationwide celebrations in memory of the Islamic revolution. He has also called people to the streets that day to show support for the nuclear program.

"Enemies of the Iranian nation ... must know that their wrongful beliefs will be revealed once again during Feb. 11 rallies by the great Iranian nation," he said, according to the state-run news agency.

The United States and many Western countries accuse Iran of seeking to develop nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran denies. The Security Council has threatened to impose further sanctions on Iran if it continues to refuse to roll back its program.

Iran insists its program is peaceful.

That last line is what gets me the most. Kim Jong Il said the same thing over and over again when it came to North Korea and its nuclear program (bought and paid for using good ol' U.S. tax dollars, thanks to Jimmy Carter and the Clinton Administration), and we know now that assertion was nothing more than the lie it always was.

There is no doubt in my mind that the same is true with Iran. Especially when they refer to the United States as an enemy.

We have to take this threat seriously. Not because I believe they'll develop nukes for missiles, but because I believe they will provide sufficient quantities of uranium to al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, and other terrorist organizations bent on destroying the West.

I'd like to believe that the U.N. sanctions on Iran would do the trick. Problem is, they won't work. There are too many countries out there that will ignore any sanctions leveled against Iran. Still, it's better to keep plugging at it that way than to do nothing at all.

Tags:

Arkin Slimes Armed Forces

It's an interesting day. On the Washington Post, William Arkin wrote a column (published Jan.30) in which he describes our military men and women as mercenaries. Here's the quote:

But it is the United States and instead this NBC report is just an ugly reminder of the price we pay for a mercenary - oops sorry, volunteer - force that thinks it is doing the dirty work.

There is much more in the piece, like:

So, we pay the soldiers a decent wage, take care of their families, provide them with housing and medical care and vast social support systems and ship obscene amenities into the war zone for them, we support them in every possible way, and their attitude is that we should in addition roll over and play dead, defer to the military and the generals and let them fight their war, and give up our rights and responsibilities to speak up because they are above society?

I can imagine some post-9/11 moment, when the American people say enough already with the wars against terrorism and those in the national security establishment feel these same frustrations. In my little parable, those in leadership positions shake their heads that the people don't get it, that they don't understand that the threat from terrorism, while difficult to defeat, demands commitment and sacrifice and is very real because it is so shadowy, that the very survival of the United States is at stake. Those Hoover's and Nixon's will use these kids in uniform as their soldiers. If I weren't the United States, I'd say the story end with a military coup where those in the know, and those with fire in their bellies, save the nation from the people.

This male obviously does not believe that our military is a force for good, considers the tools of the trade to be obscene amenities, as he is unclear about what he considers to be such, that is what I must assume he means. These are men and women serving their country, fighting al-Qaeda terrorists and fighting an insurgency fueled by hostile neighbors (Iran and Syria).

By referring to him as a male and not a man, I am using a viewpoint set forth in a classic western film of Charlton Heston, Three Violent People in which one of the characters states that all men are born male, but not all males grow to be men. So it must be with Arkin. He may be male, but he is not a man.

This is made clear by his rant against to military, where he supposed that such as our Armed Forces would seize control via military coups if this were anyplace other than the United States.

In his non-apology issued today, he shows his utter contempt for our armed forces yet again:

I said I was bothered by the notion that "the troops" were somehow becoming hallowed beings above society, that they had an attitude that only they had the means - or the right - to judge the worthiness of the Iraq endeavor.

I was dead wrong in using the word mercenary to describe the American soldier today.

These men and women are not fighting for money with little regard for the nation. The situation might be much worse than that: Evidently, far too many in uniform believe that they are the one true nation. They hide behind the constitution and the flag and then spew an anti-Democrat, anti-liberal, anti-journalism, anti-dissent, and anti-citizen message that reflects a certain contempt for the American people.

No one, and I mean no one, has ever elevated our military to the level of "becoming hallowed beings above society." Except for the chicken doves on the left, like Arkin, who are too intimidated by real men and women who have displayed the honor and integrity to uphold our constitution and our way of life by putting their own lives on the line.

He stated that he was "dead wrong in using the word mercenary," yet there is a big BUT right after that, where he proves his utter contempt for our soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines. He claims the situation is worse, that many of those who serve our country believe that they "are the one true nation." And that those who serve hide behind the constitution (what better document to use when expressing ones utter contempt for Arkin?) and the flag.

If the management of the Washington Post has an ounce of integrity, they will terminate Arkin immediately.

But they won't. They will defend and protect him, just as the rest of the chicken doves and the liberal-left always does when someone writes such contemptuous schlock as Arkin has.

One thing is for sure, Arkin is not just a chicken dove, but also a Moonbat, and thus deserving of a Moonbat Award.

Tags:

Chirac Wrong On Iran Nukes

Jaques Chirac proved this week that he does not understand the powers running Iran. From NYTimes (probably need to register):

"I would say that what is dangerous about this situation is not the fact of having a nuclear bomb," he said. "Having one or perhaps a second bomb a little later, well, that's not very dangerous.

"But what is very dangerous is proliferation. This means that if Iran continues in the direction it has taken and totally masters nuclear-generated electricity, the danger does not lie in the bomb it will have, and which will be of no use to it."

Mr. Chirac said it would be an act of self-destruction for Iran to use a nuclear weapon against another country.

"Where will it drop it, this bomb? On Israel?" Mr. Chirac asked. "It would not have gone 200 meters into the atmosphere before Tehran would be razed."

To think that Iran having a few nuclear weapons as being "not very dangerous" is foolish, when one takes into account the rhetoric that regularly comes from that country. It is clear that should Iran reach the point that they can refine uranium sufficiently to build a bomb, the greater threat is that they will sell some of this material to terrorist organizations that will then use it in a suicide nuke. That potential threat is the point with preventing Iran's continued development of nuclear technology.

It is also idiotic to think that, should Iran launch against Israel, Theran would be razed within a few minutes of such a launch. Most likely Theran would be destroyed by a retaliatory strike shortly after Iran's missiles hit their targets. Regardless of the timing, it ignores the fact that the rulers of Iran would not be phased by a potential retaliatory strike. They would take shelter, let the population get fried, then revel in the destruction.

That assumes they don't use Hezbollah to do the dirty work, which, as pointed out above, is the more likely scenario. Smuggle the uranium in, build the bomb in country, and detonate it. Then Tehran could say "Gee, how'd that happen?"

Tags:

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33