ConservaGear

Anti-Terrorist, Liberal Bashing t-shirts, bumper stickers and more.

ConservaGear

Get the Right Stuff at ConservaGear

Sqotty's Blogroll

Minnesota Organization
of Bloggers

Blogs For Bush

GOP Bloggers

Newsfeeds

Reciprocal Links

Acknowledgments

All trademarks and related service marks are the sole property of their respective owners.

Main

November 26, 2007

Chavez: Only Traitors Against New Constitution

This came out a couple of days ago.

Comrade Hugo Chavez has now stated that anyone who supports him but votes against his new constitution for Venezuela is a traitor. If this is decided on a secret ballot, I don't know how he plans on determining which "No" votes are by supporters and which are cast by opposition (who he also considers traitors).

From BreitBart:

The proposed revisions would do away with presidential term limits, extend terms from six to seven years, let Chavez appoint regional vice presidents and eliminate Central Bank authority, among other changes.

Critics warn he would also have the power to shut down Venezuelan newspapers, television and radio stations by declaring a state of emergency, and the government could detain citizens without charges during such a period.

The power to appoint "regional vice presidents" is troubling enough and harkens back to the colonial days when the colonies were over seen by appointed Royal Governors. Eliminating the Central Bank authority is also troubling, especially for the Venezuelan banking industry. The power to declare a "state of emergency" where Chavez will be empowered to shutdown newspapers and broadcasters is also a significant concern, but pales next to the power to detain citizens (i.e. political opponents) without charge.

I'm not a betting man, but I wonder how long it will take once this new constitution is in place (I'll be surprised if it fails) for Chavez to declare his first state of emergency and use those new powers?

Tags:

August 28, 2007

Iran Shows Hand On Iraq

Ahmadinejad of Iran is making its intentions towards its neighbor, Iraq, perfectly clear. They want to take control of the country. From FoxNews:

"The political power of the occupiers is collapsing rapidly," Ahmadinejad said at a press conference in Tehran, referring to U.S. troops in Iraq. "Soon, we will see a huge power vacuum in the region. Of course, we are prepared to fill the gap, with the help of neighbors and regional friends like Saudi Arabia, and with the help of the Iraqi nation."

This is another reason why we must succeed in eradicating the terrorists operating (with Iran's help) in Iraq, and build a functional democracy there.

Iran has been funneling arms, money and people into Iraq to help the terrorists and sectarian death squads destabilize the region so that they can then step in and institute a totalitarian theocracy in Iraq as well.

Add to that Iran's quest for nuclear weapons, and the entire region could go up in flames if we fail on delivering our promise of Liberty to the people of Iraq.

Tags:

August 13, 2007

Chavez Threatens To Cut U.S. Oil Supplies

Comrade Hugo Chavez, the Dictator of Venezuela, is now threatening to cut off oil supplies to the United States should the U.S. attack him again. I was unaware that we had ever attacked Venezuela.

From Reuters:

"No one should think that we're going to stop sending oil to the United States, no -- unless they attack us again," Chavez said during a speech to leaders of Caribbean nations meeting in Caracas for an energy summit.

"If they attack us again like they did in April of 2002 ... there will be no oil."

Although there was a bungled coup attempt in 2002 that temporarily ousted Chavez from power for a whopping two days, there was no U.S. involvement.

Comrade Chavez has been living in a fantasy world where he believes that the U.S. is the "Evil Empire" and that he is the "benevolent" dictator. One thing he is right about, he is a dictator, just not benevolent.

His threat to cut off oil supplies to the U.S., which accounts for about 10-15% of the oil that is consumed here, in response to any perceived attack on Venezuela is nothing more than his way of throwing his weight around and trying to pump himself up to look big. The threats should not be considered idle, but should be used as a signal for Congress to get off its behind and open up new oil fields in ANWR and on the outer continental shelf.

Tags:

August 2, 2007

Sean Penn and Comrade Chavez

It comes as no surprise to me that Sean Penn has yet to meet a dictator he hasn't liked.

From BreitBart:

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has praised Sean Penn for his critical stance against the war in Iraq, saying the two chatted by phone and soon plan to meet in person.

I don't understand why so many Hollywood elites are so fascinated with dictators, and think that they are better than President Bush. I can't see myself meeting Comrade Chavez, but then I don't think he would be willing to meet with me either.

"Welcome to Venezuela, Mr. Penn. What drives him is consciousness, the search for new paths," Chavez said Wednesday in a televised speech. "He's one of the greatest opponents of the Iraq invasion."

Chavez read aloud from a recent open letter by Penn to President Bush in which the actor condemned the Iraq war and called for Bush to be impeached, saying the president along with Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice are "villainously and criminally obscene people."

The socialist president, who shares those views, said he and Penn talked by phone-"with my bad English but we understood each other more or less."

Chavez and Penn have several things in common, first of which is their love of dictators like Castro, Ahmadinejad, and Saddam Hussein. They both agree that the U.S. should not have liberated the people of Iraq and deposed a mass-murdering tyrant. And of course, they both hate America and George W. Bush.

And let's not forget their hatred of a free press. As I recall, Penn spent time in the pen for beating up a news photographer (paparazzi?); Chavez has shutdown television stations for broadcasting opposition views.

Penn has a definite problem with telling the difference between good and evil. Chavez, on the other hand, is in denial that he is himself evil.

Tags:

July 24, 2007

Comrade Chavez Is Libertiphobic

The one thing that Comrade Chavez has proven himself to be good at is calling people "names." He also tends to be pretty hostile about it as well, directing his venom at political opponents and those he perceives as being a threat to his dictatorial powers. The latest recipient of the Comrade Chavez abusiveness is Cardinal Oscar Andres Rodriguez Maradiaga of Honduras.

From Yahoo News

"Another parrot of imperialism appeared, this time dressed as a cardinal. That's to say, another imperialist clown," Chavez was quoted as saying in a bulletin posted Tuesday on the state-run news agency's Web site.

Chavez - a close ally of Cuba's Fidel Castro - was responding to criticism from Honduran Cardinal Oscar Andres Rodriguez Maradiaga, who said in a recent interview cited by Venezuela's Bolivarian News Agency that Chavez "thinks he's God and can trample upon other people."

It's typical for the representatives of tyranny to always refer to those that oppose them as "imperialists," despite the fact that it is the forces of darkness that are pushing for "imperialism."

Now my question is: will Chavez make references to me as an "imperialist dog" if I call him an overbearing dictator with delusions of godhood? One can only hope. In the meantime, I'll continue to call him as I see him. Dictator, tyrant, megalomaniac.

Chavez made the comments during a government event late Monday. He has repeatedly clashed with Catholic Church leaders in Venezuela, calling them "liars" and "perverts," but he rarely targets high-ranking priests abroad.

Catholic leaders in this South American country have warned of alleged threats to individual freedoms under Chavez's administration and criticized his plans for a sweeping constitutional reform to transform Venezuela into a socialist state.

Let's see, Catholic leaders are saying that Chavez is taking away freedoms, silencing the opposition by restrict the freedom of the press (like his recent shutting down of a major television broadcaster), seizing the assets of various oil companies, threatening to seize the food supply system, and probably a lot more, and he calls them "perverts"?

At least there are some people in Venezuela and South America as a whole that see Chavez for what he is. Hopefully they will help the people of Venezuela realize that their freedoms are being eroded bit by bit by a man that has absolute power in his country.

As with all tyrants, Comrade Chavez is suffering libertiphobia (fear of liberty). That would explain his desire to turn Venezuela into another Cuba.

Tags:

July 23, 2007

Comrade Chavez To Expell Foreign Critics

Comrade Hugo Chavez rides again…into the news, that is. The "champion of free speech and democracy" has announced a decision that any outspoken critics from other countries will be deported.

From FoxNews:

"How long are we going to allow a person - from any country in the world - to come to our own house to say there's a dictatorship here, that the president is a tyrant, and nobody does anything about it?" Chavez asked during his weekly television and radio program.

The Venezuelan leader's statements came after Manuel Espino, the president of Mexico's conservative ruling party, criticized Chavez during a recent pro-democracy forum in Caracas.

Comrade Chavez, Dictator of Venezuela went on to claim that "freedoms" have been extended in Venezuela, such as the silencing of opposition broadcast stations, and that "Private property will respected," just as it did with the oil production infrastructure of the various oil companies operating (past-tense: operated) in Venezuela.

In his typically wide-ranging television program, Chavez also said Castro recently warned him to take precautions against possible U.S.-backed assassination attempts.

The U.S. passed laws forbidding assassination back in the '70s, and there have been no attempts on the life by U.S. operatives against Castro since that time. Castro is a bit paranoid in his old age if he thinks there are still designs on terminating him rather than letting nature take its course.

"The CIA is everywhere," said Chavez, who has repeatedly warned that U.S. President George W. Bush could order him killed.

I would say that the paranoia is gaining ground with Comrade Chavez if he seriously believes that such an attempt would be made. But then tyranical dictators like Chavez are really models of psychological stability. Remember the guy in the '30s/'40s with the silly little mustache?

Tags:

July 10, 2007

Iran Brings New Meaning To "Getting Stoned"

When I was a kid, "getting stoned" meant going out and smoking a doobie, frying brain cells in the process. Not something I partook of, but I knew a number of people who did.

In the U.S., being a Christian is considered bad, being a Muslim is considered cool. I am regularly bombasted with how the Christian right has taken control of America and instituted a theocracy. I must have missed that one. Yet, Iran, which has an Islamic theocracy, is considered by the left as being a force for good. Again, I must have missed something.

"Getting Stoned' in an Islamic Theocracy such as Iran takes on a whole different meaning than what Americans typically think.

From FoxNews:

Jafar Kiani was stoned to death in Aghchekand village, 124 miles west of the capital, Tehran, on Thursday, Ali Reza Jamshidi told reporters. It was the first time in years that Iran has confirmed such an execution.

"This verdict was carried out Thursday," Jamshidi told reporters.

Death sentences are carried out in Iran after they are upheld by the Supreme Court. Under Iran's Islamic law, adultery is punishable by stoning.

Being stoned to death is part of Sharia Law, and not something that would be implemented in a modern Westernized society. Unless the hard-left who hate anything good gets their way. Then there is a chance that Sharia will make its way into Western countries. I seem to recall reading that there has been a push to implement it on some basis in Canada and parts of Europe.

About the worst thing that can happen to an adulterer in the U.S., at least through the legal system, is a divorce. Outside of the legal system, there is always the potential of being the recipient of some STD, including AIDS. But that doesn't seem to stop some people from doing the deed. Of course if the adulterer is the one spreading diseases, they may have something other than a divorce to look forward to.

Under Sharia Law, both men and women are subject to the death penalty, and the method is a bit gruesome. In the case of a man, it calls for being buried waist deep; for a woman, buried to the neck. Then rocks are thrown at the victim (yes, VICTIM!) until they are dead. Since a woman only has her head exposed, it may well be that death comes more quickly. At least one can hope that is the case. It's a very ugly way to go.

Iran carried out this execution despite having signed off on International law that bans the practice of stoning and a moratorium that the Theocratic dictatorship implemented several years ago. It is the first such execution in several years that Iran acknowledges. One has to wonder if there has been more that the world has not heard about.

The execution, which took place on Thursday, has since been condemned by various human rights groups and Norway's Foreign Ministry filed an official protest with Iran's ambassador. A lot of good that did Jafar Kiani. He's still dead.

It is unknown what the execution date of the woman he was convicted with is. What is known is that they have been imprisoned for 11 years.

Iran is a totalitarian regime run by an Islamist Theocracy. This is the way things work in such governments. You do not have free speech. You do not have freedom of religion. And you can be executed in the most obscene and inhumane ways.

Yet there are some moonbats on the left who liken the U.S. to having become a theocracy.

The article also noted some of the crimes for which people can be executed for.

Capital offenses in Iran include murder, rape, armed robbery, apostasy, blasphemy, serious drug trafficking, adultery or prostitution, treason and espionage.

Murder, treason and espionage I can understand. But not any of the rest of the crimes on that list. And certainly not by means of stoning.

Tags:

July 2, 2007

Chavez Joins Axis of Evil

Comrade Hugo Chavez, Dictator of Venezuela, has joined the "Axis of Evil" by forging an alliance with Ahmadinejad. Okay, they call it "axis of unity," however when you look at Iran's continued fueling sectarian violence in Iraq, as well as its support for Hezbollah terrorists combined with Chavez's seizure of oilfields from Exxon Mobil and ConocoPhillips, as well as its squashing the free press by revoking broadcast licenses of televisions and radio stations that oppose his policies, I think you really do get an "Axis of Evil." Add to that Iran's nuclear ambitions and its willingness to arm terrorist organizations, and Venezuela is now considering launching a nuclear program.

From FoxNews:

"The two countries will united defeat the imperialism of North America," a beaming Chavez told a news conference during an official visit to the Islamic Republic, which the United States has labeled part of an "axis of evil".

Comrade Chavez complains that Washington gets upset when he visits the terrorist thug Ahmadinejad (also known as Iwannajihad).

There are some differences between the two dictators.

Set aside the fact that Iran is run by an Islamo-Fascist dictator that has been caught, repeatedly, funneling arms and personnel into Iraq in support of the anti-government terrorist groups, you still have the fact that Iran has been supporting Hezbollah and other terrorist groups, repeatedly threatened the annihilation of Israel, suppresses free speech, and, Ahmadinejad, in particular, participated in the Embassy hostage crisis back in 1979.

Comrade Chavez has not, to my knowledge, been supplying terrorist groups with arms and personnel.

In comments certain to please his hosts, who have often called on the United States to leave Iraq, Chavez branded those invading Iran's neighbor as "barbarians", drawing parallels with the European colonization of Latin America centuries ago.

"Those who try to convince the world that in Iran there are a bunch of barbarians are barbarians themselves."

Iran's hardline Kayhan daily said the two countries were riding on a "global anti-imperialism wave."

To be riding a "global anti-imperialism wave" would imply that there is a wave of global imperialism. Aside from Iran's ambitions to control the region, I have no clue what "wave of imperialism" they are referring to.

As for the comparison of Western Europe's colonialism to the current operations in Iraq, there really isn't any real basis for it. The U.S. and our allies are in Iraq and Afghanistan at the invitation of their governments. We are helping these countries get their militaries up to snuff to deal with the current and ongoing crisis, and doing a pretty good job of it.

To call us "barbarians" for coming to the aid of an oppressed people is silly, to say the least; the real "barbarians" are the terrorist thugs inciting murder and mayhem in Iraq. People like Ahmadinejad and Muqtada al-Sadr, and many like them.

Comrade Chavez is a fool for dealing with Ahmadinejad. Just how big a fool only history will tell.

Tags:

June 30, 2007

Japan A Victim?

Usually I would stay away from controversy when it comes to history, (exeption: continued refernces to Vietnam by politicians), however there is a quote in the following that needs to be addressed: From FoxNews:

Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma said the dropping of atomic bombs on Japan by the United States during World War II was an inevitable way to end the war, a news report said Saturday.

"I understand that the bombing ended the war, and I think that it couldn't be helped," Kyodo News agency quoted Kyuma as saying in a speech at a university in Chiba, just east of Tokyo.

Kyuma's remarks drew immediate criticism from Japanese atomic bomb survivors.

"The U.S. justifies the bombings saying they saved many American lives," said Nobuo Miyake, 78, director-general of a group of victims living in Tokyo. "It's outrageous for a Japanese politician to voice such thinking. Japan is a victim."

It is the last paragraph in the above excerpt that I feel a need to address. Miyake is half-right. Yes, the use of two atomic bombs against Japan ended the war and saved American lives. I have read that the estimates of American lives saved to be about 500,000 (this may be total casualties, not just those killed). It was estimated that the invasion of Japan would have a casualty rate, for both sides, many times that of the Battle of Okinawa. It also shortened the war by at least a year, perhaps more. This would put a Japanese casualty rate somewhere around 2,000,000. That was actually figured into the reasoning for using the atomic bomb on Japan.

As for the final part of Miyake's statement, "Japan is a victim," let us remember that it was Japan that started the war with the United States, not the other way around, by bombing Pearl Harbor. It was also Japan that routinely executed prisoners of wars as well as civilian prisoners, such as took place on Wake Island prior to it's being retaken and in the Philippines where prisoners of war were executed by burning as well as during the Bataan and Sandakan Death Marches.

June 27, 2007

Chavez Wants To Be Dictator For Life

It looks like I am not alone in my viewpoint of Comrade Chavez, the dictator of Venezuela. This s form the Washington Post:

Insecurity, "malignant narcissism" and the need for adulation are driving Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's confrontation with the United States, according to a new psychological profile.

Eventually, these personality traits are likely to compel Chavez to declare himself Venezuela's president for life, said Dr. Jerrold Post, who has just completed the profile for the U.S. Air Force.

Chavez won elections for a third term last December. Since then he has stepped up his anti-American rhetoric, vowed to accelerate a march towards "21st Century socialism" and suggested that he intends to stay in power until 2021 -- a decade beyond his present term.

But Post -- who profiled foreign leaders in a 21-year career at the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency and now is the director of the Political Psychology Program at George Washington University -- doubts that Chavez plans to step down even then. "He views himself as a savior, as the very embodiment of Venezuela," Post said in an interview.

"He has been acting increasingly messianic and so he is likely to either get the constitution rewritten to allow for additional terms or eventually declare himself president-for-life."

Post sounds like he is on the same page as I am, or maybe it's the other way around. Comrade Chavez, in his crusade to turn Venezuela into a Cuba look-alike, is revealing his true colors. It was just a few days ago that Chavez stated he was ready for war with the United States, and made some very colorful, and wrong, accusations of what the U.S. is doing.

Meanwhile, Chavez is taking steps to seize the oil producing assets of ExxonMobile and ConocoPhillips. From FT.com:

Venezuela's state-owned oil company is taking over multibillion-dollar projects owned by ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil, Rafael Ramirez, the country's energy minister, said.

The action was being taken following a failure to agree the terms of a handover of operations in the oil-rich Orinoco belt, said Mr Ramirez.

The oil groups refused to sign an agreement on how the Venezuela's state-owned oil company PdVSA would take majority control of heavy crude oil projects in the Orinoco belt, which are valued at a total of at least $25bn.

The loss of its Venezuelan operations would be a particular blow to ConocoPhillips. Its operations in the Orinoco belt were valued at about $6bn and accounted for about 10 per cent of the company's reserve base and 4 per cent of its worldwide production.

Mr Ramirez said PdVSA was increasing its share in the four projects, which lie above some of he largest heavy crude oil reserves in the world, from an average of 40 per cent to 78 per cent.

Chavez has been pusing to "nationalize" (fancy word for confiscate) the oil industry projects in Venezuela. Some companies have managed to reach an agreement turning over majority control to Chavez. ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobile have both refused as offers are sub-market value. In other words, Chavez is taking control by offering pennies on the dollar for what these companies have invested in Venezuela.

Both companies are reported to still be in negotiations, however I suspect that they will be forced to the table and sign some losing agreement, or they will lose their entire investment.

Quite frankly, if I were the head of these companies, I would push for a total buyout and let Venezuela screw things up.

As for Chavez, it has been clear to me for sometime that he is a megalomaniac. It is good to know that there are people with some pull who are recognizing that as well.

Tags:

June 26, 2007

Terrosit Propaganda in the Red Star Tribune

I am stunned that the a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.startribune.com/commentary/story/1267828.html">Star Tribune would publish a propaganda piece for a terrorist organization. No, I am not speaking of al-Qaeda, but Hamas. This is sickening. If I were a subscriber to the Red Star Tribune I would cancel my subscription. As it is, I check out the online edition only, therefore no subscription to cancel.

The commentary piece is by a Palestinian named Ahmed Yousef, and he has a lot to say about how it is America's fault that things are lousy for the Palestinian people.

The Palestinian National Authority apparently joins the list of elected governments targeted or toppled over the past century by interventionism: nations that had the courage to take American rhetoric at face value and elect whomever they would. No doubt some in Washington persist in the fiction that the United States is following a "road map" to democracy for Palestinians, just as others believe the Iraq war has been a sincere exercise in nation-building. Neoconservative strategists have miscalculated, however, and Hamas is stronger than ever.

Hamas is a terrorist organization. Although they are not international in nature, they have used terrorist attacks against Israel for decades, suicide bombings have become the weapon of choice for Hamas, murdering children and the elderly. When Israel retaliates by eliminating their terrorist thug leaders, they cry "foul."

Some critics raise the red flag of "Al-Qaida" and say that Hamas and parliament are a stalking horse for Salafi jihadists. I defy them to demonstrate one instance in which Hamas' military structure has struck against any force outside the theater of the occupation. The struggle has always been against the Israeli agenda of ethnic cleansing and conquest. Hamas is a movement of Palestinian liberation and nationalism -- Islamist, yes, but in the sea of contending faiths that is the homeland, where is the sin in loving one's creed?

Al-Qaeda like? Iffy, but certainly a "stalking horse for Salafi jihadists' is a fair assessment, although they are more public than "stalking."

As for the "military structure" of Hamas, if they really were a legitimate military, they would stop targeting school buses and shopping malls and focus on strictly military targets. However, they are nothing but a bunch of cowardly terrorists bent on murdering innocents.

This guy falsely claims that Israel is carrying out an "agenda of ethnic cleansing and conquest." If this were true, there wouldn't be any Palestinians for Israel would have succeeded at that already. Instead, the Palestinian population continues to grow faster than the population of Israel.

Further, it is the Palestinians, through organizations like Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, and others that have been pushing an agenda of ethnic cleansing against the people of Israel. Israel has had to deal with mortar, rocket, and suicide bombings nearly everyday for the last six or seven years.

Palestinians want, on their terms, the same thing Western societies want: self-determination, modernity, access to markets and their own economic power, and freedom for civil society to evolve. Those who warn of "failed states" and "Hamastan" as a breeding ground for terrorism forget where blame for failure belongs -- at the feet of the American administration, which has chosen to isolate the elected government.

The Palestinian people could have achieved their goals of self-determination, etc. decades ago. They could even achieve such today, immediately, if they had the leadership and the will to live in peace with their neighbors. However, the majority has been unwilling to accept a two-state solution, and many who claim they support such, are merely talking out of the sides of their mouth. This includes Hamas.

And they blame us for their problems, when it is clearly something they are in total control to achieve, or, as they have chosen, flush down the toilet.

The Bush administration never intended to honor the outcome of fair and transparent elections in the occupied territories. The embargo, designed to punish the electorate for its choice, was the first step toward crushing new democratic institutions. The second has been to find collaborators for the American agenda and to supply them with advisers, funds and weapons for their campaign of destabilization. The final step will be to truncate Gaza from any proposed Palestinian state and make it a de facto prison for all "undesirable" aspects of Palestinian nationalism. This will culminate in provocations designed to trigger a military response from Israel, which will "justify" a war on Gazans. This would be tragic for all concerned, and the international community, especially the Arab League, must not allow such an outcome.

The U.S. rightfully cut of support of the Palestinian Authority as it is run by a terrorist organization dedicated to the destruction of a close ally, Israel. The American people should not be expected to have their tax dollars, money that I work hard to earn, handed over to a pack of murdering thugs. If the Palestinian people had chosen to elect leaders instead of terrorists, things would be different. And that is the bottom line: Palestinians need leaders, real leaders, who are willing to step up to the plate and actually lead their people to peace and prosperity, rather than down the road of terrorism and destruction.

I guess I should not be surprised that the Red Star Tribune would publish this piece of tripe. The editorial staff of the Red Star Tribune, and other newspapers across the country seem to think that terrorists are the good guys, while America is the bad guy. They must be deranges.

Tags:

June 25, 2007

Comrade Chavez Ready For War

It seems that over the weekend off Comrade Chavez noticed and decided to give me something to write about this morning. Yesterday, the Dictator of Venezuela announced that he was ready for war with the United States. He claimed that the U.S. is already executing a media, propaganda and economic war against his totalitarian regime. Somehow I missed the announcement that we were carrying out such a campaign against him.

From FoxNews:

Dressed in olive green fatigues and a red beret, Chavez spoke inside Tiuna Fort - Venezuela's military nerve-center-before hundreds of uniformed soldiers standing alongside armored vehicles and tanks decorated with banners reading: "Fatherland, Socialism, or Death! We will triumph!"

"We must continue developing the resistance war, that's the anti- imperialist weapon. We must think and prepare for the resistance war everyday," said Chavez, who has repeatedly warned that American soldiers could invade Venezuela to seize control of the South American nation's immense oil reserves.

U.S. officials reject claims that Washington is considering a military attack. But the U.S. government has expressed concern over what it perceives as a significant arms build-up here.

Ah, yes, he is just pumping up his people in the fashion of such tyrants as Castro, Hussein, Stalin, Mao, and that nutter with the little mustache that wrought so much terror in the world.

Ho many times over the past couple of years has he claimed that the U.S. wants to bring him down and topple his government? How often has he refereed to our as "evil" and "the devil?"

If we wanted to carry out an economic attack on his country, all we would have to do is stop importing oil from there. Not likely to happen, unless we open up ANWR and more off-shore drilling. Then, in a couple of years we can tell Chavez to stick his oil up his, well, you get the idea.

Comrade Chavez, who idolizes Fidel Castro, has in recent months confiscated oil companies and has shut down Venezuela's oldest broadcasting station (so much for free press in that country) and has threatened to "nationalize" other business sectors. Such actions will divide the people of his country, at least the ones who are paying attention to what he is doing. We don't have to carry out a campaign of psychological warfare against Chavez.

What is of concerned is his purchase of over $3 Billion in arms from our "ally" Russia, including 24 SU-30 Sukhoi jet fighters. Chavez also announced that he is considering buying anti-aircraft missile batteries and submarines. These are a serious concern if he is able to make these purchases.

Quite frankly, I believe that Chavez overrates his importance. He hasn't murdered hundreds of thousands of his own people (like Saddam Hussein), or is executing acts of terrorism on a global scale. Okay, he has been cavorting with terrorists, like Ahmadinejad (did I spell that right?), so maybe there is some "guilt by association." Maybe.

Eventually, I hope, that his move to eliminating free speech in Venezuela will bring about his downfall and the people of Venezuela will regain their natural rights of "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness."

Tags:

June 20, 2007

Jimmy Carter: Father of the Iranian Revolution

That is the name of the opinion piece in which Michael Evans writes about Jimmy Carter and the disastrous policies he implemented that wrought the problems in the Middle East of today. It seems we have a lot to thank former president Jimmy Carter for, and Evans scores his points accurately and concisely. This is a must read piece.

We just don't get it. The Left in America is screaming to high heaven that the mess we are in in Iraq and the war on terrorism has been caused by the right-wing and that George W. Bush, the so-called "dim-witted cowboy," has created the entire mess.

The truth is the entire nightmare can be traced back to the liberal democratic policies of the leftist Jimmy Carter, who created a firestorm that destabilized our greatest ally in the Muslim world, the shah of Iran, in favor of a religious fanatic, the ayatollah Khomeini.

Carter viewed Khomeini as more of a religious holy man in a grassroots revolution than a founding father of modern terrorism. Carter's ambassador to the UN, Andrew Young, said "Khomeini will eventually be hailed as a saint." Carter's Iranian ambassador, William Sullivan, said, "Khomeini is a Gandhi-like figure." Carter adviser James Bill proclaimed in a Newsweek interview on February 12, 1979 that Khomeini was not a mad mujahid, but a man of "impeccable integrity and honesty."

The shah was terrified of Carter. He told his personal confidant, "Who knows what sort of calamity he [Carter] may unleash on the world?"

It was Carter who pressured the Shah of Iran to release political dissidents and ease censorship, which in less troubled times would make since, but not at that time for Iran. And not those particular dissidents. As Evans points out, "Khomeini could never have succeeded without Carter." He is right about that.

Evans outlines a lot of issues we still have to deal with thanks to Carter.

The Iranian revolution that replaced the pro-Western Shah of Iran with the totalitarian Islamo-Facist Ayatollah Khomeini was only the beginning. It was also during Carter's administration that the Iran-Iraq War broke out, resulting in millions of dead and wounded. It was also at this time that the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan and marked the rise of Osama bin Ladin and the foundation for al-Qaeda was laid.

Carter's response to crisis? He made an ineffectual attempt at obtaining the release of our embassy people held hostage by Iranian terrorists in the name of Khomeini. He boycotted the Moscow Olympics in response to the Soviet Union's invasion of Afghanistan. He believed that every crisis can be resolved by diplomacy alone. Such a mindset is what resulted in World War II and the murder of some six million Jews in the holocaust. It is this mindset, instilled throughout the Democratic Party, that resulted in two aircraft being driven into the World Trade Center, killing thousands of people, while a third was crashed into the Pentagon and a fourth slammed into a farm field. That day could have been far worse if it had not been for the courage of the passengers on that fourth airliner.

Thanks a lot Jimmy.

Tags:

May 30, 2007

Chavez Threatens Broadcasters

Comrade Chavez, one of my "favorite" people to write about is in the news again. He is now threatening to shutdown yet another broadcaster in Venezuela. From FoxNews:

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez defended his decision not to renew the license of a popular opposition-aligned television network and warned Tuesday he might crack down on another TV station, accusing it of trying to incite attempts on his life.

Chavez said his refusal to renew the license of Radio Caracas Television, which went off the air at midnight Sunday, is "a sovereign, legitimate decision."

He said another station Globovision - one of the few channels that is still harshly anti-government - had encouraged attempts on his life and could also face sanctions.

"I recommend (Globovision) take a tranquilizer, that they slow down, because if not, I'm going to slow them down," Chavez said in a speech.

The claim came about as a result of Globovision broadcasting a retrospective of its 53 year broadcast history in which they ran some footage of the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II.

Chavez has been ranting that opposition broadcasters have been attempting to incite violence by broadcasting "capitalistic poison." CAPITALISTIC POISON? Well, I suppose when you are communist dictator, anything that espouses liberty would be considered poisonous.

It is probable that Comrade Chavez is, by claiming that broadcasters are inciting violence, attempting to shutdown all opposition media within Venezuela. He can use these same claims to throw broadcasters and anchors into prison.

At one point on Tuesday, opposition supporters gathered at the offices of the Organization of American States where they chanted "this is a dictatorship."

I think they've got it right.

According to Comrade Chavez, the enemies of Venezuela has a name. From Reuters:

"Enemies of the homeland, particularly those behind the scenes, I will give you a name: Globovision. Greetings gentlemen of Globovision, you should watch where you are going," Chavez said in a broadcast all channels had to show.

Other broadcasters in Venezuela are very concerned over this trend and rightfully so. RCTV was the oldest and biggest broadcaster in Venezuela. If comrade shut them down with the wave of a pen, what is to prevent him from doing the same to the smaller broadcasters?

Let's face it, if you live in a country where you cannot freely express an opposing opinion without fear of retribution or incarceration, then you are not free.

Tags:

May 7, 2007

France Getting It Right?

The People of France have elected Nicolas Sarkozy as their new president. The conservative Sarkozy won a significant victory over his hard-left opponent, Royal, with over 53% of the vote versus 46% of the vote for the Leftist of France.

Sarkovy intends to push hard on his pro-market and anti-crime agenda, which will be good for France.

Meanwhile, the punks on the left rioted in Paris, throwing objects at police; firebombs were used against schools and community centers around the Essone region.


FoxNews has more, including pictures of cars that wre overturned in the riots.

Tags:

May 4, 2007

Chavez Threatens To Confiscate Banks, Steel Producers

Comrade Chavez of Venezuela, not content with nationalizing oil companies, is now making noises that he intends to confiscate private banks and the steel industry. The message he is sending is clear to me: don't invest in Venezuela, as you'll be a target for confiscation.

From myway.com:

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez on Thursday threatened to nationalize the country's banks and largest steel producer, accusing them of unscrupulous practices.

"Private banks have to give priority to financing the industrial sectors of Venezuela at low cost," Chavez said. "If banks don't agree with this, it's better that they go, that they turn over the banks to me, that we nationalize them and get all the banks to work for the development of the country and not to speculate and produce huge profits."

As I understand the way banks operate, they use the money from their depositors (that would be folks like you and me) to loan to other people to finance their projects, whether it is for mortgages, business or consumer loans, etc. Part of the profits realized from the loans is used to pay the depositors for the use of their money. Interest is based on the amount of risk involved. If someone wants to borrow $200 Million dollars to build a new facility, and the company's revenues are miniscule, then there would be substantial risk involved. Okay, we know all of this. Apparently, though, Chavez doesn't.

Banking according to Chavez is: if you make a decent return on your investment, you are bad and not helping out your country.

As for the steel producers (Sidor is the main target), it looks like he is targeting them due to their selling Venezuelan steel overseas, where they can get a better price for their product than they can domestically, and then steel users have to rely on imported steel so that they can get a better price for their needs than using locally produced. It may be inefficient, but, hey, that's called capitalism. Buy low, sell high. Probably the local market price steel is kept low du to the imports from China making the price of locally produced steel uncompetitive, thus the need to export it to countries that will pay a price high enough to make operating steel mills profitable.

"Sidor has to produce and give priority to our national industries ... and at low cost," he said.

Of course Chavez, being a hard-core progressive, doesn't like capitalism, and wants to force the steel producers to sell at a price below the cost to produce, or force the construction industry to pay substantially more for the steel and thus raising the cost of construction.

Chavez is pushing hard to turn Venezuela into a communist country, doing it one piece at a time. As he has stated on many occasions, this is all part of his plan: to make Venezuela more like Cuba.

Tags:

April 16, 2007

al-Sadr Pulls Followers From Iraqi Cabinet

When I saw the headline on Foxnews as "al-Sadr orders 6 cabinet ministers to quit," I immediately jumped to the conclusion that this guy is out of control. Although al-Sadr is out of control, these resignations may actually be good for Iraq. Here's a clip:

Radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr ordered his followers to withdraw from Iraq's coalition government on Monday, the head of his parliamentary bloc said.

With this first paragraph it becomes evident that the six ministers in question were al-Sadr puppets.

The piece goes on to explain that the reason given was to make way for more "independents" who will "represent" the people. One can only hope that that will be the end result of these resignations and who replaces them.

Al-Sadr, who wields tremendous power among Iraq's majority Shiites, has been upset about recent arrests of his Mahdi Army fighters in the U.S.-led Baghdad security crackdown. He and his followers have also criticized al-Maliki for failing to back calls for a timetable for U.S. troops to leave the country.

If al-Sadr is truly serious about ending U.S. involvement in Iraq, and dislikes having his terrorist followers arrested, then he should A) get rid of the terrorists in his midst; B) throw his full support to achieving a free and democratic government in Iraq; C) disband his militia.

Instead, al-Sadr continues to take a confrontational role, and maintains an armed "militia" of terrorists and murdering death squads.

It is clear to me that the reason al-Sadr wants the U.S. out of Iraq is so that he can become the next tyrant in Iraq.

Tags:

April 11, 2007

North Korea Bulks At Reactor Shutdown

In the realm of the predictable, North Korea is refusing to shutdown its nuclear reactor as agreed when a its assets were released. From FoxNews:

North Korea wanted to delay a weekend deadline for shutting down its nuclear reactor by a month, but the United States said that was too long, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson said Wednesday.

"We let them know that this was not acceptable and the issue was dropped," he said. Instead, Richardson said the shutdown should only take a "few days."

"Now the ball is in North Korea's court to take the next important steps," he said, adding that officials there had reaffirmed a commitment to making initial moves to disarm.

This is why you should NEVER treat with communist dictators. They LIE! If anything, the assets in question should have remained frozen until AFTER North Korea could prove that it had shut down its reactor. By appeasing the dictator of North Korea, and releasing the money first, you put him in the power position. The leverage to get him to shut down the reactor has been removed.

Maybe Kim Jong Il will surprise me and keep the agreement. But I will not be holding my breath on that.

Tags:

April 4, 2007

Cavorting With Dictators

When a Globetrotting Leftist reaches out to a totalitarian dictator such as Assad of Syria, you have to wonder what their motivations are. When that Globetrotting Leftist is the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and second in line of succession to the Presidency, those motivations become clear. It's all about subverting U.S. Policy in the Middle East, and bashing the current administration. From MyWay News:

Pelosi's visit to Syria was the latest challenge to the White House by congressional Democrats, who are taking a more assertive role in influencing policy in the Middle East and the Iraq war.

Bush has said Pelosi's trip signals that the Assad government is part of the international mainstream when it is not. The United States says Syria allows Iraqi Sunni insurgents to operate from its territory, backs the Hezbollah and Hamas militant groups and is trying to destabilize the Lebanese government. Syria denies the allegations.

By reaching out to Syria, it is being argued, and correctly so, that the U.S. has two different foreign policies, just as it is becoming clear that Pelosi and other Leftists in Congress, believe there should be more than one Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces.

Syria is responsible for the ongoing violence in Lebanon between the various factions in that country, including the terrorist organization Hezbollah. Syria has supplied arms, training, money, and other support to Hezbollah and various terrorist groups in Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Syria has repeatedly called for the destruction of Israel, and is in close alliance with Iran. Most of the suicide bombers operating in Iraq arrived in Baghdad from Syria. The list goes on.

By recognizing, and mainstreaming Syria, Pelosi not only undermines U.S. policy in that region, she endangers the lives of American troops operating in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as Americans traveling abroad. Attempts to marginalize a sitting president are typical of the hard left that controls Congress, and therefore, it is not surprising. However, this blatant attempt at undermining U.S. policy jeopardizes the chances of stabilizing that region of the world.

Once again, the hard-left Democrats are showing their true colors and the Neville Chamberlain like tactics to appease dictators and terrorists will only beget more violence against the U.S. and our allies.

Tags:

March 26, 2007

Chavez Leads Venezuela Closer To Communism

Comrade Chavez is busily pushing Venezuela towards communism again, this time targeting confiscating farms and ranches. From IHT.com:

President Hugo Chavez announced Sunday that his government's sweeping reforms toward socialism will include the creation of "collective property."

Vowing to undermine capitalism's continued influence in Venezuela during his television and radio program "Hello President," Chavez said state-financed cooperatives would operate under a new concept in which workers would share profits.

"It's property that belongs to everyone and it's going to benefit everyone," said Chavez, a close ally of Cuban leader Fidel Castro whom opponents accuse of leading Venezuela toward Cuba-style communism.

Sounds as though Chavez's opponents have got him right. "Collective property" is a euphemism for state-owned, and it is clear that Chavez intends to bring everything under the control of the government, meaning himself, since their legislative body has granted him the power to execute law by decree. There are no longer any "checks and balances" in Venezuela to prevent Chavez from implementing his plans of totalitarianism.

In countries that operate under Marxist doctrine, such as Cuba, China, the former Soviet Republic, and now Venezuela, it is the top dog (and their loyal supporters) who get it all, while the people, whom they claim to serve, struggle on in poverty and slavery to the State.

"It cannot be production to generate profits for one person or a small group of people that become rich exploiting peons who end up becoming slaves, living in poverty and misery their entire lives," he said.

In other words, taking your money and investing it in business with the anticipation of making a profit is bad, despite the fact it employees people to get a job done. And these people were not forced to accept these jobs, they chose to do so, which is something the people in China don't get to do.

The piece goes on to iterate that current policies of confiscating land from large farms and ranches, redistributing it to poor people to work, has failed to revive the agricultural industry in Venezuela. No surprise there as what is needed is more, and modern, large-scale farm equipment that can do the job far more efficiently than small-scale farming.

It also points out that Venezuela continues to import food staples such as meat, milk and sugar, because of ongoing shortages.

So, what good is "sharing the profits with workers" in a country that cannot produce enough food to feed itself? If the peons have it so good under such regimes, then why have so many thousands of people fled Cuba over the last 40+ years?

What's really going on in Venezuela is a grab for power, and it is the people that will end up paying the price.

Tags:

March 16, 2007

Castro and Cuban "Elections"

I am trying to figure out why this is news. From FoxNews:

Fidel Castro will be in "perfect shape" to run for re-election to parliament next spring, the first step toward securing yet another term as Cuba's president, National Assembly head Ricardo Alarcon said Thursday.

Castro is a dictator, not an elected statesman. Cuba is a totalitarian country that has not held a free election since it fell to Castro and his communist thugs nearly half a century ago. Run for re-election? You've got to be kidding.

Tags:


March 9, 2007

Comrade Chavez At It Again

Comrade Chavez is spewing more venom in Venezuela again. This time in response to President Bush's tour in Latin America. From FoxNews:

Venezuela's firebrand leader said Friday that President Bush's Latin American tour was nothing more than an attempt to improve America's image, dismissing pledges of U.S. aid as a cynical attempt to "confuse" the region.

I find the word choice in this opening statement, refering to the communist dictator as a "firebrand leader' rathr repugnant, but typical of the MSM viewpoint that anything that is opposite America and our values must be good, and America and its leaders are invariably bad. At least Republican leaders.

President Hugo Chavez, who complained last week that Bush's tour was meant to divide Latin America and isolate his leftist government, launched a counter-tour of his own, arriving late Thursday in Buenos Aires. He said the U.S. leader only recently "has discovered poverty" in the region.

"I believe the chief objective of the Bush trip is to try to scrub clean the face of the (U.S.) empire in Latin America. But it's too late," Chavez said of recent Bush pledges of aid. "It seems he's just now discovered that poverty exists in the region."

In an interview with Argentine state television Channel 7, Chavez promised his scheduled soccer-stadium rally Friday night in Buenos Aires "will be confrontational. I believe you have to point out the contrasts. If he says 'Yes,' we say, 'No!'"

America has been very cognizant of poverty in the region south of the U.S., and its causes: government corruption, communism, drug cartels, and dictators like Hugo Chavez.

This year, Chavez has been very successful in concentrating total power in his country with himself, including the power to pass laws and confiscate property by decree (no checks and balances).

Okay, so if Chavez wants to be confrontational, and say "no!' to everything we say "yes" to, let that also include ALL economic aid to that region as it is obvious that they do not appreciate our efforts to help them rise out of poverty and grasp the hand of freedom. They seem to prefer totalitarianism and enslavement rather than liberty and self-government.

Gotta wonder: how long will it take the people of Venezuela to wake up and smell the roses; to realize that they've been had and have given total power to megalomaniac.

Tags:

March 8, 2007

China On U.S. Human Rights

What's that old line, "kettle black?" China, the glowing example of human rights, is blasting the U.S. over alleged human rights violations. From FoxNews:

China on Thursday accused the United States of trampling on Iraq's sovereignty, saying Washington was using its campaign against terrorism as an excuse to torture people around the world and violate the rights of its own citizens.

The charges came in a report titled the "Human Rights Record of the United States in 2006," China's response to U.S. criticism of Beijing's human rights record in a report Tuesday by the State Department.

"As in previous years, the State Department pointed the finger at human rights conditions in more than 190 countries and regions, including China, but avoided touching on the human rights situation in the United States," the Chinese report said.

China is a country that is responsible for the murder of some 65 MILLION people, not counting the millions of forced abortions used to enforce its one child per family rule. It routinely imprisons political dissidents, and runs gulags where the prisoners are used as slave labor.

America has the highest regard for human rights. This is not to that there aren't a few rogues who disobey orders and do things that are repugnant, such as Abu Ghraib.

Prisoners at Guantanamo Bay are treated exceedingly well; they are not tortured (unless you consider listening to Barbara Streisand sing as torture); they are given Korans (think that would happen in Iran?) and ethnically appropriate meals (no pork); the best health care (as opposed to be shoved in a hole to rot).

As for China, and its accusations that the U.S. is violating the sovereignty of other countries, what about their incursion into Tibet? How about the thousands of students killed at Tianaman Square in 1989? And it's continued threats to seize and annex Taiwan?

What I don't get is why so many Americans give a rat's you-know-what about what China, a totalitarian dictatorship, thinks about America. More importantly, why do they fault America for the rare violations instigated by rogues (who have been tried, convicted and incarcerated) as being so bad on human rights, yet they consider China, Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, and many other totalitarian and oppressive regimes as being glowing examples of how America should be?

Tags:

March 1, 2007

Ahmadinejad Blames U.S. and Israel, Again

Ahmadinejad is foaming at the mouth again, this time in Sudan. From FoxNews:

"There is no place in the world that suffers from divisions and wars unless America or the Zionists' fingerprints are seen there," Ahmadinejad told his audience in Farsi translated into Arabic.

He urged Muslims to rally behind Iran and accused detractors of Iran's nuclear program of trying to prevent a developing country from making scientific advances.

"Our strength and the cornerstone of the victory is in our (Muslims') unity ... we have to pay attention to the devils who want to cause divisions among us," the Iranian president said.

Let's see now, Iran has threatened to annihilate Israel for how many decades? As they move closer to nuclear weapons, further destabilizing the region, and it's Israel and the U.S. who are to blame? Iran is arming terrorist groups and death squads operating in Iraq, and that is somehow OUR fault?

Sudan has been running a pogrom in Darfur, and that's our fault, too, I suppose. There is violence throughout much of South East Asia, where the U.S. has little, if any, involvement, but Islamic terrorists are heavily involved.

Basically, it is "Iwannajihad" Ahmadinejad blaming the West for the ills of the world, regardless of the fact that many of the problems we now face has its roots in radical Islam. What else is new?

Tags:

February 28, 2007

U.N. WantsTo Tax America

Some scientific Dunsels on the U.N. payroll are at it again, calling for a global temperature ceiling. From Voice of America:

A group of 18 scientists from 11 countries is calling on the international community to act quickly to prevent catastrophic climate change.

In a report requested by the United Nations and partially paid for by the privately funded U.N. Foundation, the panel warns that any delay could lead to a dangerous rise in sea levels, increasingly turbulent weather, droughts and disease.

Question to these "scientists:" How do you stop the unstoppable?

The modern warming trend, which has been going on since 1850, is a natural phenomenon, not something mankind has triggered. All one has to do is look at the geological evidence to understand that there isn't anything, short of extinguishing the sun, that can be done about it.

Still, they clamor about carbon dioxide emissions (with CO2 accounting for about 350 parts per million, a little less than 0.04%, in the atmosphere), and that something has to be done about those nasty fossil fuels.

Some of their concerns, such as rise in sea levels, regardless of the fact that sea levels change as the Earth's climate warms and cools, rising and falling with each cycle; droughts can be countered with the construction of desalination plants in the coastal region; the spread of virulent diseases, such as the bubonic plague, were spread by rodents during times of global cooling.

Now we get to the main focus of their agenda:

Holdren, however, says even these measure will achieve very little unless they are accompanied by a global tax on greenhouse gas emissions. "We don't think ultimately society will get it right in terms of the full range and scope of activities needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, until there is an additional incentive in the form of a price on greenhouse gas emissions, either through a carbon tax or a cap and trade approach," he said.

As the United States is considered the "worst offender" when it comes to CO2 emissions, it is clear that their agenda is to tax America into oblivion. Such a tax goes against the very foundation of our society: no taxation without representation. The cornerstone is that there shall be no taxation except through by the consent of the people to be taxed, via there ELECTED representatives. This is why all tax bills begin in the House of Representatives. We "the people" do not have elected representation in the United Nations. The U.N. is made up of a bunch of appointed bureaucrats, mainly from socialist countries and totalitarian regimes. Any such global tax, which is clearly designed to break America economically, is a clear violation of sovereignty (as are all international laws) and adoption of which would be a direct violation of our Constitution.

Quite frankly, I've pretty much had it with the U.N. and the puppet governments that make up a large part of that body politic. Their petty jealousy of America has further corrupted that already heavily corrupted organization. With incidents as the "food for oil" scandal in Iraq, and the "food for sex" scandal in the Congo, how can we accept anything the U.N. claims as being legitimate?

If any such treaty as Kyoto, or its planned successors, is signed by the United States, every politician involved with passing and signing such, should be immediately removed from office for violating the U.S. Constitution, which they have sworn to uphold.

Tags: